User talk:Xtina fighter2

January 2015

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Bbb23 (talk) 02:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xtina fighter2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I strongly disagree with this ban as this awards is a respecatble contribution to the upcoming Youtube stars. It is not SPAM or ADVERTISING. We are required to post a link to the source right? What do you consider notable? As many articles on wiki has radio stations wins and prizes etch on their pages. Some whom never heard about. So why are they considered acceptable and mines aren't Xtina fighter2 (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Considering that all your edits are adding mentions of this prize, I consider it unquestionable that you have a conflict of interest here, and thus your block has a merit. Max Semenik (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xtina fighter2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I argue that I have no other interest than updating the awards section of the winners and nominations. Thus I do not understand what other conflict of interest would be gain from myself Xtina fighter2 (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. Please find somewhere else to advertise your non-notable award. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xtina fighter2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This decision has been made with prejudice. It is not 'my' award since this is a result of research. Once again 'notable' or 'not' you have failed to make a sensible reason why. Furthermore an 'indefinite' ban is incredible without fair reason. From crimes ranging from miscellaneous abuse to vandalism. This do not fit the bill. If editor wished not to include this entry with their article. A simple not interested would suffice. Xtina fighter2 (talk) 20:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears to be your award as you are the only person pushing it. In this context, an indefinite block is reasonable. PhilKnight (talk) 22:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm including it and not "pushing" it. As I said before this is a result of a research. Your indefinite block is without any merits or without any grounds to stand on, or without any satisfaction of an answer I repeatedly asked for. Xtina fighter2 (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your Talk page access. You have requested an unblock three times and been declined three times. Each time you effectively repeat what you said before. You may use WP:UTRS to appeal.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]