User talk:Xiphactinus88

Welcome!

Hello, Xiphactinus88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Xiphactinus88! Your additions to Inoceramidae have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evolution of insects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hexapod. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jarmila Kukalová-Peck

You added information about Bojophlebia as mayfly in several pages, but looks like you did not notice that fossil is Reinterpreted[1]. Also you should know that, as described in that paper as well, Kukalová-Peck did some problematic studies for fossil insects, especially "over-interpretation". She even processed fossil to reinforce her interpretation[2], and misinterpreted groups several times[3]. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is really surprise for me. I found info about Bojophlebia for the first time in Wikipedia itself. It was in an article about Ephemeroptera that you have edited already. I’m glad that there are people who are not indifferent to such fakers as Kukalová-Peck. Xiphactinus88 (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pachydiscus

added a link pointing to Hungaria

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's Hungary, of course. I fixed it.Xiphactinus88 (talk) 09:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About citing reliable sources

Please see WP:RS for more information. Thanks, Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know this rule. Do you think I did something wrong? Xiphactinus88 (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in this edit, you replaced a recent citation with something much older, from 1946, whereas the original citation was published in 2020. Old information is likely to be contested. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At first I added the 2020 source, but later it seemed very dubious to me, so I replaced it with the one that is in the article about the Meganthropus. You insist that the 2020 source is not dubious. No questions, let it remain in the article. Xiphactinus88 (talk) 22:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

references

I see you are doggedly adding or updating references to a bunch of articles. Excellent! Now, it's time to learn to use templates like {{cite journal}}, et al, to help assure consistent formatting. Also, there are bots out there that will maintain cite template wrapped references. Cheers! - UtherSRG (talk) 10:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, I just wrapped all of the refs in Archaeolemur in {{cite journal}} and {{cite book}} templates as appropriate. I then used citation bot to update the refs in various ways. Let me know if you need any help, and good luck! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for support! I don't have enough time but I'll ask you for help when I need it. Xiphactinus88 (talk) 11:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dauphine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is Dauphiné, I see. Xiphactinus88 (talk) 08:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cave lion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]