User talk:Xiong Chiamiov/archive/2007/01

Vandalism

Dear Xiong Chiamiov,

Ms. Bhutto talks about democracy but has never held free and fair elections within her own party. She rules her party autocratically as a family business she inhereted from here father. It is sad for her party because if free and fair elections are held within her party a bright secular leadership can emerge, but Ms. Bhutto insists on being Prime Minister for third time which is not allowed under the constitution of her country. She carried on her shoulders the burden of stealing at least 1.5 billion dollars from her country and also the extra judical killings of thousands of immigrants of Indian origin who had migrated to Pakistan. It is also alleged in some circles that her husband was responsible for her brothers murder because he was challenging the leadership of her party.

Why did you send message to me. I had put down undispuatable facts. You are trying to suppress facts that are verifiable.

Regards,

Paknet

Hello dear Xiong Chiamiov, me several edits became again and again deleted again and again from the same person (User:Geo-Loge). This prevents me from it, to improve my articles. There, they pursue me already to the English Wikipedia. What can I do against this i****, which me disturbs?

Thank you (User:Nadia Kittel)

First of all, you should not ignore or disturb communication. Than you should read wikipedia policy, than you should read my comments on the changes that "prevents" you improving "your" articles. At least you should notice, that I have started an Requests for investigation due to a couple of forms of vandalism. Geo-Loge 17:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Dear Xiong Chiamiov, sorry for discus this on your talk page. It is the first time for hours that we have Nadia Kittel communicating.

To Nadia:

Hello again Nadia (is that what you'd like to be called?). I'd like to cover a few ground rules here, before things escalate and you get into trouble.

First off, you should read Wikipedia's copyright policy. It is very important that all pictures you upload do not violate copyright. The easiest way to make sure they don't is to take them yourself, if you're in the area.

Second, always remember that none of us actually "own" an article. You may do a lot of work on an article, but it still belongs to everyone. That's what makes WP so great! If you and one other user are disagreeing, it's a good idea to leave a note on their talk page explaining what you are trying to do. You can also put a message on the talk page of the article. Without communication, there is no way you can understand each other; that will lead to your edits being constantly removed in an edit war. Edit wars are not helpful to anyone, so we try to avoid them.

It appears that Geo-Loge and you have similar interests. If you are going to be editing the same articles, you should learn how to get along.

I am rather curious as to why you are putting old information articles, though. Can you explain that please?

I've noticed that you have blanked your talk page. Rather than doing that, it would be much better if you archive them. Just copy everything there into a new page (such as User talk:Nadia Kittel/archives/1) and place a link here. Or, if you are lazy like me, you can have Werdnabot automatically archive for you.

I hope that all of this mess gets settled. Remember, stay cool. Cheers! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 03:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Geo-Loge:

Hello. First, I am not an admin (though I wish to be) :) .

I've written a note to Nadia. I would also like to remind you (though I'm sure you know) of the 3 revert rule. You and Nadia have taken up a whole page of history for yourselves ;). Didn't your mother teach you to share? We'll see what Nadia says; he seems to be more receptive of me, perhaps because I was the one that welcomed him and gave him initial advice. I'll be around, so let me know how things are. And remember, always stay cool. Cheers! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 03:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KT Tunstall

I left a documented piece of trivia on the KT Tunstall page which you referred to as an "experiment." Could you please clarify why this was done? I attached a documented link to the source.

Though I used the "some fans" wording so despised, it was not in the context in which it is avoided, IE as weasel words. Clearly, the articule provided as a source referenced the fact.

I will be at this IP address for the rest of the night, and will then be able to be contacted at gkarber (at) gmail (dot) com. Thank you very much. I hope we can resolve this as quickly as possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.31.231.113 (talk) 04:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

To gkarber via email:

Hmm, I'm sorry about that. I remember checking that article, and seeming to see an inconsistency. However, it was that she was appreciative of her gay fans; I though it said that she was not gay, but she was. So sorry, but any time gay or lesbian is in an addition to an article, I tend to revert. I did actually look at that one, I just made a mistake. Happy New Year! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 08:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello dear Xiong Chiamiov, I had updated the contribution to Dresden. The populations and other facts, was wrong. This User:Geo-Loge had immediately deleted everything. He even had not contributed anything to this article. Then I shortened everything, so that again it on 72 kb. He disturbet. He sabotaged my whole work and hindered me. I had delivered only interesting additions, more not and there I have not to discuss any desire. Then, he did again and again me erasure my contribution of Rudolf Harbig Stadion simultaneously as well. Simultaneously, I had to improve these, n what however, I came no more to did it. Therefore, he immediately should have been closed, because aimed my new, matching data, which he aimed deleted. He had current datas again and again deleted and is informed others incorrectly, because of himself. And furthermore my work was pointed. Why he will not closed? However, it is fact that he made only everything all broken!!!!!!!!!!

Thank's

I'm Kay in reality. User:Nadia Kittel

Nadia, please try to talk to Geo instead of to others about him. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first balloons launched in 1783

Would you be so kind and take a look at this lemma: Montgolfier_brothers. I am trying to improve it, making remarks and references, but my English is not sufficient. I was working on the Dutch lemma the other day and gathered some knowledge. I think the French are best informed on the subject.

Simon Schama writes very literary about the brothers Montgolfier and the balloons and is citing only French sources. His account is interesting, funny and looks reliable.

I assume one of the authers was using a book in French on the subject, or: *Gillispie, C.G. (1983) The Montgolfier brothers and the invention of aviation, 1783-1784 : with a word on the importance of ballooning for the science of heat and the art of building railroads. Princeton, N.J, Princeton University Press. But Schama does not mention it, and I have not read it yet.

May be you like to cooperate on the lemma. Taksen 07:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for the extra life

I think my health increased to unprecedented heights! --דניאל - Danielrocks123 ^contribs 00:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK

i will be sure to do that!--Peace237 02:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello ur very stupid i know it ha ha ha ha ha ha told u

Your 1up award

I've had to remove it. The reason is that the image is copyrighted. It is used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use, and fair use images are not allowed anywhere other than article space: see WP:FU and WP:RFUI for more on the policies. Sorry, it was a nice initiative.. but those awards have to use free images. Mango juice^talk 21:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it chaotic to know to whom to direct messages to in Wikipedia. I have attempted to correct gross errors in some of the articles on Portuguese history, but find that what I contribute is "dissed" by obviously ignorant people who know next to nothing about the topic. They are insulting to me as well. I would like to make two suggestions. 1) If you ever want a decent article on Prince Henry the Navigator the writer needs to start from Sir Peter Russell's recent bio of him. The idea that a bio written a century and a half ago (Major)is as good or better than Russell is utter, absurd nonsense. But there are idiots around who make such a claim. HE'S NOT EVEN READ MAJOR !!! 2) If you ever want a decent article on the controversy over the discovery of Brazil, the writer needs to incorporate the information to be found in Duarte Leite, Luis de Albuquerque, Bailey Diffie, as well as that in the Historia Naval Brasileira and Vigneras (if the writer doesn't know who these historians are he has no business writing the article). If the writer can't do that and can't read Portuguese you will never get even a minimally competent article. The problem with Wikipedia is that many of the contributors are abysmally ignorant of the topic involved (ESPECIALLY HIM), and the monitors (of whom I presume you are one) don't know much more. What your qualifications are I have no idea. I am a professor of Portuguese history at a major US university IT'S A MINOR UNIVERSITY IN ARIZONA WHERE THERE IS NO MAJOR UNIVERSITY. A PROFESSOR IN THE U.S. IS OF COURSE NOT A DEPARTMENT HEAD AS IT IS IN MANY PARTS OF THE WORLD. IT IS MERELY ANY MINOR LECTURER NO MATTER HOW MUCH OF A NOVICE HE MIGHT BE. SO HE IS A MINOR NOVICE LECTURER IN A MINOR UNIVERSITY. But I would never get involved in going to the extensive trouble of writing an article for Wikipedia because of having to fend off imbiciles (no other word fits) like "Dr. Lisboa" and others. VERY ODD WORDS CONSIDERING THAT DR LISBOA HAS REPEATEDLY HUMILIATED HIM ABOUT HIS IGNORANCE AND FOOLISH CONTENTIONS.

The editor above is a serial and cowardly abuser. He initiates rudeness on every single occasion. This becomes very apparent when you check his edits. He also has a remarkably deluded knowledge of the subjects he edits. I have repeatedly asked him to substantiate his contentions on the Prince Henry the Navigator article but he is never able to. He attempts to dodge the questions by every possible means. His obvious inadequacies in this respect are very plain on the discussion page of that article. He has been assessing the various biographies on Prince Henry despite only having even read one instead of checking them all as I have done. He quotes another fallacy ridden book as if it were true depite never having checked the original sources that it liberally misquotes. It is a case of somebody who deals with history in a very naive and superficial manner, but who doesn't realise how ignorant he is. --Dr Lisboa 23:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xiong, the second paragraph above, from "I find it chaotic....." onwards is actually from an anonymous editor. I added the dark text in order to correct some of his misleading statements. He started editing recently, and has been causing trouble since he arrived. Despite having a superficial knowledge of the subject, he has been making radical unsubstantiated claims and has been very arrogant and abusive to just about everyone. He had already been warned about his actions by one Administrator, but continued. However, once his ISP and their complaints procedure were detailed he suddenly ceased all editing. I suspect that we may not see any more of him. --Dr Lisboa 19:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

24 season 6 dvd cover

Hello i have tried to get this image on the artical about the tv show "24" for the region 2, 24 season 6 dvd boxset cover on it. would you mind doing for me please. Here's the link below

[1]

Septemeber brings a new semester... your right myspace does suck so I created a site for our organization using go daddy. Thank you for the kind words and suggesting to help you are sure nicer than other users.

Have a nice one

ironwolf285 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironwolf285 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

needs someone blocked (or banned)

71.70.233.151 is at it again. I undid the vandalism this person did on Cary, North Carolina, I see you've already undid Charlotte, North Carolina and the tazer incident page. I see this IP has been blocked one already, this needs to be done again or they need to be banned.--Rtphokie 10:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Cesari and McKenna

This law firm is wiki worthy for several reasons, i over rule your error, and i offer the following. If you disagree with me, then i urge you to delete the page but please leave me a message with your justifications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rollinsk (talk • contribs) 06:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ref: Putting Hindi Drama Club in the category 'Articles to be merged'

Merging the article Hindi Drama Club to BITS Pilani would be a mistake, since the creators of this article intend to expand it to an article discussing techniques in theatre developed by this club. Putting it as a part of the College article sounds awkward to me.

We could put a link out from the BITS Pilani article to the Hindi Drama Club article as an alternative. What say? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.92.60.195 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Mooky

That photo was released to Bebo himself, I'd assume if he would put it somewhere like that he doesn't mid it being used. Citikiwi 03:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure can Citikiwi 04:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the encouragement :) WhisperToMe 06:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Rex Ryan

Hey, I saw your listing on WP:AIV but I protected the page instead of blocking. Next time head to WP:RPP when there's a wide range of vandalism occurring to request protection. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My electrons

Thank you for the electrons! See you around on IRC. :D delldot talk 05:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, whoops, I think I misread your note at first, since you said RC patrol, some part of my brain interpreted that as "RC patrol using the countervandalism channel on IRC" - don't ask, it's a strangely functioning brain. But yeah, I like it. The countervandalism channel (#cvn-wp-en on freenode) has bots that report suspicious changes (i.e. typical vandal edits, like blanking the page). Plus it breaks the monotony to have someone to talk to while you're rv-ing v. Plus, I use it to ask questions that I want to get a response to right away rather than leaving a note on someone's page and having to wait. You should check it out if you get the chance! Peace, delldot talk 05:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at WP:ACC

Please see WP:ACC, and let me know if my solution to your request is OK with you, or if you need further action. Also, while I'm here, on a completely different subject, you might want to consider using a slightly lighter shade for your user page background; I could hardly read the black text on the dark brown background. Could be an anomoly with my screen/browser/etc, however. --barneca 20:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were prevented from creating the account (either logged in or logged out) without an admin to help you (which, I should have pointed out somewhere, I'm not). No one else can create it either, for the same reason. So, instead of creating the account, I just created and redirected the user and user talk pages to yours. Glad it's satisfactory. --barneca 20:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]