User talk:Ximmerman

License tagging for File:Antigod.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Antigod.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Anger

Hi there. I wanted to say that this is nothing against you or your edit. The subject of genre for St. Anger was discussed to it's full in the talk page, and there are not references for anything other than Heavy Metal. The source you brought only says "the guitar tuning was not in the standard "E", but rather in the unnaturally low "Drop C," which was a popular guitar tuning during the short-lived nu-metal craze" which is very far from saying the album is a nu-metal album. If you feel otherwise, feel free to discuss it at the talk page first. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 13:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no it's not much of a big deal. I just saw an edit war, the last guy put Drone metal as the genre (with no source too). But sources aside, if you compare St Anger to most nu-metal albums you'll notice a lot of similarities, guitar tone, song structure and vocal style. But for now I'll agree, there are no official sources that say it's a nu-metal album, so it should be kept as just heavy metal until a better source is found. I thought that source MIGHT be enough since it describes the sound and compares it to nu-metal, but perhaps it might be worth a mention in the article? -Ximmerman (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a secret - I couldn't care less. I don't listen to this music or understand what it's about. It's just an article that had a HUGE edit war in the past on this, and as an uninterested party, I'll keep reverting it to sources until an appropriate source shows up saying differently. If you want to add a sourced fact to the article, be my guest. I wouldn't know where to begin. Cheers, and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 23:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthrax.fight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anthrax.fight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pre Viam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pre Viam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Annihilator band 2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Annihilator band 2004.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Die with Honor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Die with Honor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LittleBaby.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LittleBaby.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fight 'Em 'Til You Can't for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fight 'Em 'Til You Can't is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fight 'Em 'Til You Can't until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]