Jump to content

User talk:Xiangcha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Xiangcha, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 00:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters medium size > 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs   two or three paragraphs   three or four paragraphs
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

An article you recently created, List of North American Pleistocene Proboscideans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of North American Pleistocene Proboscideans. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 18:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Xiangcha! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edits

[edit]

Hello, I see you've been making various unconstructive edits to paleontology pages. These include changing time intervals and size estimates without justification and contrary to the cited sources (even when told to stop at Vivaron), and editing published cladograms away from their original structure (like at Rauisuchia). Please do not add taxa to cladograms that were not already present in the source, and please do not add unsourced size or age estimates. If they are personal estimates without a source, that qualifies as Original Research and is against site policy. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Norian, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Xiangcha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of North American Pleistocene Proboscideans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xiangcha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of North American Pleistocene Proboscideans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]