User talk:Xhantar
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xhantar |
Welcome to the User talk page for Xhantar! |
|
|
|
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Xhantar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --ais523 16:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey man
[edit]Hey man, I noticed you were new on the Wikifying WikiProject, and now I'm noticing that you're new to the entire place, so I'm just dropping a nice little personal welcome message (contrasting with the copy-pasted welcome message that you can see above). If you need help with anything, just add a little comment on my talk page, or call me on my phone (just kidding ^^). So, to make a long story short, welcome to Wikipedia, hope you're gonna have a lot of fun and contribute a lot! See you :)
Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me! • See my edits!) 02:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Zouavman Le Zouave, thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia. I wasn't sure whether it's customary to reply on my own talk page, or here...but anyway, here I am.
- I've just finished wikifying Linux color management; lemme know if there's anything obvious that I've missed.
- Well, generally it's more useful to reply on the other user's talk page, so that he/she is warned that a reply has been made. However, other users use different methods (such as replying on both talk pages, etc.). I'll also be working on some articles that have been tagged "to wikify" from August 2006, so we shall see each other again :p --Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me! • See my edits!) 07:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
More hello
[edit]I'm saying hello as well - although I'm a fairly new at being a "serious" Wikipedian I've been getting a bit addicted lately and clocking some serious edits. Your work looks good to me - infoboxes rule! The only other thing I try and do if I can is add an image if I kind find a free use one or fair use if its a logo/album/movied etc... but that is an extra hassle Madmedea 14:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Madmedea. Nice to know I'm not the only newbie around! Thanks for the suggestion. I actually wanted to include an image, as one is available on their website and Template:Infobox_School does provide for an image to be included, but got a bit lost while reading about copyright/license tags, public domain, fair use, rationales and whatnot. I'll give it another shot though at a later stage—preferably after getting some sleep :-)
- See you around! —XhantarTalk 14:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah it took me a little bit of to-ing and fro-ing before the I got the hang of it - and knowing the different rules between Wikpedia and Wikipedia commons. The basics are:
- if you took the photo/made the drawing and are happy for others to use it - uploaded it to Wikipedia commons, choose the license you want to release it under (or go public domain), and then link from the article to there.
- If someone else has created it and posted it somewhere with a GNU or Creative Commons license or it is in the public domain the, that is allowable under the Wikipedia commons so upload it and link to it stating where you got it from and the licence it is under.
- For everything else you can only upload it to Wikipedia and then its only allowable if you tag it "fair use" and provide an additional rationale. This is most commonly used for album covers, DVD covers, company logos etc. For examples see: Image:WIEGOlogo.gif and Image:BangDVDcover.jpg. Sorry for rambling... Madmedea 16:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah it took me a little bit of to-ing and fro-ing before the I got the hang of it - and knowing the different rules between Wikpedia and Wikipedia commons. The basics are:
- Great, thanks. I borrowed your rationale from the examples you gave (hopefully it wasn't copyrighted), and uploaded Nsds_logo.png. I now feel less likely of being sued. —XhantarTalk 03:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge?
[edit]I'd advise against making seperate articles for minor characters in a manga. If there's little chance the article can evolve past a small stub, you might consider merging this content into the main article. Friday (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Friday (wish it was!)
- I'm afraid I've just finished doing so. A merge was proposed for the article Minor Characters of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, but it was felt that merging the two would make the article JoJo's Bizarre Adventure too cluttered (see the talk page). I do understand your reasoning though. In the end it was quite difficult to decide what to do, but I created separate pages since a lot of the sections on Minor Characters of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure already exist as separate pages anyway.
- I've:
- Created new pages for each of the sections at Minor Characters of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure that already contained any information regarding a character and did not already exist as another page
- Linked to it from the wikitables at JoJo's Bizarre Adventure
- Tagged them with
{{Expand|date=January 2007}}
, as was done to the original article - Added them to Category:JoJo's Bizarre Adventure characters
- Changed Minor Characters of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure to redirect to JoJo's Bizarre Adventure
- However, if any of this is a big problem, feel free to revert and speedy delete. I'll leave Minor Characters of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure as is for the time being. —XhantarTalk 18:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see this as any kind of major problem- I was just makin a suggestion based on what I saw at the time. Thanks for the reply. Friday (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
List template
[edit]Love the create-list template, very nice -- and useful :) Thanks -- --Bookgrrl holler/looksee 02:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) —XhantarTalk 07:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Etheric Projection
[edit]I noticed that you took an interest in editing the EP section to the astral projection article.
I wanted to let youk know that I had to reverse some of your edits, not because they were incorrect, but because there was a very specific reason why I needed certain parts to be grouped together a certain way. You see, when they deleted the etheric projection article, they ignored all the evidence that it exists as a phenomenon (not to mention made many silly and subjective comments) not synonimous with astral projection-- the purpose of grouping some of the sources together a certain way, is to make the case blatently obvious. I hope to have the etheric projeciton article returned one day, so what is there is meant to build the case to people who are more willing to actually look at the evidence.
However, if your interest persists, I think we can work together to make that whole page look really good. Thank you. solstice 19:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi solstice. No problem! While I am interested in the subject matter, I am by no means an expert, and my edits were an attempt at tweaking the article's layout and making it "look better"—not changing its content. Apologies for any frustration caused, and thanks for letting me know. I'll be happy to help out if I can. —XhantarTalk 20:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- What would really help, is get other people to agree that the two kinds of psychic projection (astral and etheric, et al) are deserving of their own articles, or should be merged into one "OBE" entitled article. I think we can agree that it is incorrect to be lumping EP with the former, since there is evidence to indicate they are not alike, at least from a literary point of view. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psychicbody (talk • contribs) 03:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
Anu Malik
[edit]Hi Your edit on the Anu Malik page is good. Earlier, I had structured this page from a single section, retaining much of what was there before. I did add some sections, like intial years and Alisha Chinoy, and stuff (hadnt used this login, I think). But in general, nice to see an improvement in the article. All the same, keep it up:) AJ-India 05:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Let me know if there is anything else I can help with. —XhantarTalk 13:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Printable Version "problem": Thanks again
[edit]Hi
Just want to mention that your explanation of the mechanics of what was actually going with the printable version of the topic, did make sense to me and I appreciate your effort.
My thanks are a poor return for the enlightenment you have given me, but I hope you will accept them all the same.
Twilght's End 23:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing :) —XhantarTalk 00:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]thank you for your help.however, it does not work I have question for you how can i make my page like your charming page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eyas Hajeh (talk • contribs) 09:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
- You are quite welcome. I assume you are referring to my user page, which is by no means charming, compared to some other prime examples. Thanks for the compliment, though! See this for extensive information regarding user page design. Hope this helps. —XhantarTalk 10:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Gallery
[edit]Thank you very much!!! It really helped, however, the text doesn't move back up to the top. If you could help with that too, it would help a bunch! World of Springfield Supergeeky1 12:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry I haven't gotten around to this yet. I now see what you mean, about the text not wrapping properly around the gallery. I'm pretty sure I can make this work, one way or another. I'll have a look at it soonest and let you know. —XhantarTalk 22:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed, I think. Please see your talk page. —XhantarTalk 11:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Stylah. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. VictoryAfrika 16:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC) I was told to put this on the talkpage of the administrator who deleted my page named, Stylah. If I done something wrong, tell what it is, if not please go to deletion review and UNDELETE my page please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictoryAfrika (talk • contribs)
- Hi VictoryAfrika,
- I think there is some confusion here. I am not an admin, nor did I delete the Stylah article. I simply responded to your request for help and explained that the article was deleted, pointing to the archived AfD. I see the article was deleted again on 12:47, 6 February 2007 by Jimfbleak (see [1] for the logs). The comment he used was: article about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7). I'll also post this message on Jimfbleak's talk page. You can contact him here. However, I see he is on a wikibreak for the rest of February, so it might be a better idea to contact the admin that deleted the article the first time around (Can't sleep, clown will eat me - contact him here).
- Cheers. —XhantarTalk 18:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the Advice
[edit]Thank you for the advice regarding age limits (0-infinity). Very useful! Andrew Marsden 08:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem! I'm always happy to help. —XhantarTalk 08:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for advice
[edit]Thanks for the advice on merging Billy Mandindini - much appreciated! DocDee 00:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the link to helpme template
[edit]Thank you very much for your prompt advice to my inquiry on helpme code. If you would be so kind and patient to tell me how to install this template, I would be much obliged. I am sorry to bother you with such a basic questions. It is not that I am being lazy. I have been learning about MediaWiki and Wiki in general day and night in last month or so. But, there are so many new things, languages, codes, and rules to learn. I find deciphering codes faily easy but familiarizing with different jargons and different utilities very challenging. I can create or edit a template, but I get totally lost with where I put it and what I do with it. I assume you are a very busy person and I do not expect you to be able to pay attention to every new member's inadequacy. Yet, your kindness shall be much appreciated if and when you find a time and heart to help me with this at all. --Kohyin 07:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kohyin: Not at all! I am glad that I could have been of help so far and am always willing to respond to kind and civil requests such as yours.
- Not my intention to give you the run-around, but you might be able to find more specifics at the following resources as well as people that I am sure are more familiar with the MediaWiki software than myself:
- The MediaWiki Help Contents
- The MediaWiki Community Portal
- Specific to your question: Templates on MediaWiki
- I can, however, divulge the following information about the workings of Template:helpme, as known to me so far:
- Basically, content on Wikipedia (and thus also the WikiMedia software) are divided up into different namespaces. For example, normal run-of-the-mill articles exist in the "main" namespace; that is, articles without a ':' in their name. In contrast with this, templates exist in the "Template" namespace. So, when looking at the helpme template, you would visit Template:helpme (note the "Template:" in front of the template name). Creating new templates works similar to creating new articles—just create a new article, as normal, but call it, for example: "Template:helpmeplease" (without the quotes). So, on your installation of MediaWiki, you would start a new page, and call it "Template:helpme" (without the quotes), and then copy and paste the code from here into your new article (template). You can, of course, customize the content as you see fit, and will probably need to change some of the links in the template code because they'll point to pages that might not exist on your installation of MediaWiki. Once done, save the page, and you would have created the new template.
- What's important to understand is that the helpme template, apart from displaying the helpme notice when added to a user's talk page, also adds the username of the person on whose talk page the template was added, to a particular category—in the case of the helpme template on Wikipedia, to Category:Wikipedians looking for help. A "bot" (short for "robot", which is an automated program) then regularly checks that category and reports any users waiting for help in an IRC channel, monitored by volunteer helpers, such as myself. On Wikipedia, this is done by a bot called "helpmebot", in the #wikipedia-bootcamp channel on the Freenode IRC network. The bot keeps doing so, every 3 minutes, until the user requesting help has been responded to, and the {{helpme}} notice has been removed from his/her talk page.
- So, to get the helpme template to work on your installation of MediaWiki, the way it does on Wikipedia, you would have to create a bot similar to "helpmebot". As far as I know, on Wikipedia, the "helpmebot" monitoring Category:Wikipedians looking for help was created by User:pgk—also an administrator on English Wikipedia. You might try asking him for permission to copy and use the source code of the bot he developed. Feel free to refer him to this message, if you want, for context.
- Good luck! —XhantarTalk 18:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your detailed and caring response. It seems I have a lot more to learn. I will follow your directions and will see what I can do with my limited knowledge and experience. Just FYI, I bought a couple of books on PHP, MYSql, Java, and Apache today in hope to understand more about the basics. I am very thankful for your kindness. It is very encouraging and comforting to know that there are professionals like you who are ready to help. --Kohyin 02:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Personal attacks on me
[edit]Thank you for your reply to my query. I don't think talking to the other parties involved will be any helpful; I've already asked them not to attack me, and the results have been further attacks. They refuse to respond to my claims about source reliability on the grounds that I've done O.R. to check the sources. Here's a sample of what I've gotten:
"Aben, I'm sorry but I think it is time you cut your losses and stop arguing. It is beginning to sound like denial."
"Your claims are irrelevant, since they are ooriginal research. (...) I think its time to quit, bud."
"If you value your time, you'll give this silliness up."
"Abenyosef has created a username seemingly for the sole purpose of advancing this material, and other anti-Zionist propaganda, on this article (and apparently no other article). He keeps on referring to the presumpton of good faith, but that presumption is rebuttable. At this point, a consensus has spoken loud and clear, and yet he persists. I believe, at this point, that he has lost the presumption of good faith. At this point, he is merely troll pushing an ideology through the usual misinformation, propaganda, and outright lies."
And, finally, the most stunning attack was:
"Actually, WP:NOR applies quite explicitly to the way sources are chosen and used. It baffles me that you would imagine you understand Wikipedia's content policies better than I do. You've been editing Wikipedia for 2 weeks, almost all of it to this article and Talk: page; the hubris in imagining you have the content policies down pat is astonishing."
This is amazing because the author of this attack is an admin and is on the arbitration committee.
What can I do? Especially taking into account that one incident involves an admin.--Abenyosef 16:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, complaints about admins are primarily dealt with by other admins. Given my non-involvement in this dispute and lack of knowledge about the specifics, I would suggest taking your complaint to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents first. That is the correct place to post an open, informal complaint over the behaviour of an admin.
- From Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct#Dealing with grievances: If you think an administrator has acted improperly against you or another editor, you should express your concerns directly to the administrator responsible. Try to come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. However, if the matter is not resolved between the two parties, you can take further action according to Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. For more possibilities, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_administrator_privileges. —XhantarTalk 17:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback on Still Pending
[edit]Thanks for the constructive feedback on my first page. To be honest, I removed the page from the feedback section because I was a bit intimidated. I am also a bit concerned that my page might be deleted due to not meeting the minimum requirements for notability. I hope not, because I think that the band is notable. I have incorporated most of your comments - they were quite helpful. Thanks again. Stampsations 19:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Stampsations
- You're welcome! I've added a "References" section to the page with a few of the most-likely-to-be-accepted-as-reliable sources that I could find, which should increase its chances of meeting the notability criteria for bands. As it stands now, I am fairly certain that it does. —XhantarTalk 01:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Very nice. I appreciate that. It looks good! Stampsations 04:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Do you know what's going on with my entry for Still Pending? It has been flagged for deletion. But it also looks like it has been the subject of some spam? I believe that it meets the notability requirements, as you have stated. I don't exactly understand how to read the revision history. I could also use some help defending the notability of the group. Thanks Stampsations 05:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- It appears that this issue has been resolved and the entry has been reverted to its original state. Stampsations 15:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- There has been a recent influx of interest in the article, it would seem. I've reverted two seemingly bad-faith edits, one by 124.178.210.158 (talk), who almost completely blanked the page, and another by 138.217.209.191 (talk). They have both been warned.
- As for the rest, Wikieditor07 seems to feel that the article lacks notability and is being used for promotional purposes. He completely blanked the article, twice, but both edits were reverted, the first time by Ryulong, and the second time by an automated bot, VoABot II (see here). After that, he tagged the article for speedy deletion with {{db-spam}} and removed all External Links. The nomination for speedy deletion was reviewed by an administrator, NawlinWiki (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), and declined, because it "asserts notability w/indep. sources" (edit summary). As such, it looks like the article will be taken to AfD instead, if it's nominated again, where its deletion can be debated instead of simply speedy deleting.
- You can view the revision history by clicking on the "History" tab at the top of the article's page, or by going here. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with. I'm continuously watching the article and its talk page and will provide input where I can. —XhantarTalk 19:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Space indent block thingies
[edit]Hi. I left an answer on my talk page - probably best to keep it in one place. This is just to let you know. -- zzuuzz(talk) 02:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I appreciate your efforts! —XhantarTalk 11:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Newbie?
[edit]Hey, Xhantar! Last night you helped me with problems regarding "Musical Notation". (I am afraid I am a bit of a computer illiterate, and should have considered a simple cache cleanup.) I am also a relative "newbie" at Wikipedia (since last summer). I looked at your edit count. Why don't you add another "box" to your user page, i.e.,
500+ |
. I am nearing 1,000 edits, and can't wait to "step up"! It's amazing how quickly the edits add up!
What truly surprises me is your ability to help me, when you are a newbie yourself. I suppose you simply understand computers better than I do! I want to express my appreciation of not only your helpfulness, but your politeness. (Although I rarely call for help, I know some "helpers" can be be slightly insulting, in contradiction of the most simple Wiki policy, "be nice". You were nice!)
I agree, we need a MALE term for "Wikifairy". I've hesitated to add this tag to my user page for such reasons. Despite the fact that fairies are NOT defined by gender or sexual orientation, the colloquial usage of the word "fairy" (a derogatory expression for homosexual) can hardly be changed, even through the might of Wikipedia. In fact, I taught a "piano major" a couple of years ago (a most masculine fellow) whose hero and role-model was Peter Pan (a fairy)...he simply wanted, more than anything, to be able to fly! Might I suggest the term Wiki-Wizard?
Best, Prof.rick 04:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, wow! I didn't even notice! It probably would have been much harder figuring out exactly what that 500th edit was if I wasn't told, so thanks for letting me know. Incidentally, it was an edit I made in one of my sandboxes—go figure. Userbox added :-)
- I really need some more mainspace edits, actually, as it's required by a few of the more advanced editing tools, like AutoWikiBrowser, which I'd love to play around with. Maybe I'll start reverting some vandalism; I suppose reverts count towards mainspace edits?
- Wiki-Wizard - I like that, but I guess I'm stuck with the "official" term and article it links to. There is actually some discussion here about exactly that, and I agree with the comments made by Ugliness Man and WikiSlasher. Go, Peter! :) —XhantarTalk 10:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
Yeah, WOW! There are several edit counters. My favourite is Interiot's [2]. It gives a breakdown of your kinds of edits, articles you've worked on, talk edits, etc. I think editing to any Article probably counts as "mainspace", which would include reverting vandalism, and probably even improvements in spelling, grammar, wording, etc. You'll love it!
I'll check out those links you mentioned regarding "fairy". In the name of Peter Pan, Prof.rick 05:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
My template
[edit]Although the template seems to work on Wikipedia, it does not on other wikis...is #if Wikipedia-only? Thanks for the help, though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VDZ (talk • contribs) 20:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
- In MediaWiki 1.7 and up, it looks to be part of the "ParserFunctions (extended)" extension. See here, here, here and here. —XhantarTalk 11:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh. Apart from installing ParserFunctions, you'll also need to create Template:!, which will allow you to encode a pipe (|) character within template parameters. More at Wikipedia:Qif_conditionals. —XhantarTalk 11:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Cute little boxes!
[edit]Thought you might enjoy this one too!
This user reserves the right to completely screw up his own edits. |
. Prof.rick 05:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for creating Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Bangladesh/to do page. I am new at this, and with all the good intentions, I might need enormous amount of help. Aditya Kabir 12:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I replied on your talk page. —XhantarTalk 12:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Of course, you can delete those. In fact I was about to ask you - how do I delete them. Man, you're an angel. Aditya Kabir 12:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow! Thanx
[edit]I've been to the bootcamp; no one answered anything I said, including "Hello!" haha I'm familiar with IRC, it's cool. So I went to #wikipedia, didn't know anyone, and left. But now I know they are there, and I'm learning to communicate. I learn best by observing, so I learned how to put in numbered references, except at the bottom where they match the [1] in the text. I had to just manually add the numbers [1], [2], etc. Wiki is addicting. I have neglected my personal writing for two days. Got to get back to work one of these days! lol CurtisEdward 18:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for looking!
[edit]Thanks very much for coming by to look at the Cars image problem, it's appreciated, I had no idea where to even start trying to fix it. One Elephant went out to play... 20:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Whatever works is fine by me, really, I just wanted to report it and was happy someone who knew more was able to look at it. I understand probably the bare minimum of how to do stuff on here. One Elephant went out to play... 21:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Your last edit seems to have worked, it looks right on my computer too, thanks for the help again! One Elephant went out to play... 21:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
moving content
[edit]Xhantar, I didnot realize the factual numbers of references to the subject pretensions of perceptions would be for discussion. It was meant to support the idea that the subject "pretensions of perceptions" was important enough not to delete completely. Would it be different if my own comment did not addend the info? Thanks CurtisEdward 19:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pretensions_of_perceptions"
welcome - witaj
[edit]I'm from Poland and I can't speak English! I'm not begginer user! Please see - [3]
Konradr 09:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
IRC cloak request
[edit]I am Xhantar on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/Xhantar. Thanks. --XhantarTalk 13:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your assistance. That was really frustrating. Never have thought of putting the right inside of the table. --Darkest Hour|DarkeBot 18:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) —XhantarTalk 18:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again
[edit]Thanks again for helping me with my technical problem, I was really becoming frustrated. Another day or two and my laptop might have ended up getting "booted up" by a pair of size 15 Rockports. Quadzilla99 18:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, no problem :)
- Funny enough, someone else asked the exact same question right below yours at the Village pump, and it's starting to show up semi-regularly at the Help Desk as well. I'll see how it goes, but it might become a good candidate for including in the list of FAQs on those pages.
- Another idea I had was to simply have a little explanatory note appear as part of that blue-tinted popup, with a link to the already-existing FAQ about the "issue" on the NavPopups page. Maybe I'll go bug Lupin about that...
- Anyway, happy editing! —XhantarTalk 19:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Noni
[edit]Thanks for your help. I've posted to AIV before, and I was going to put it there, but this seemed like a different issue, so decided to just ask for help. The WP:3RR page mentions posting to administrator noticeboard, and the noticeboard says to post at AIV, so I eventually posted it there, even though AIV says that unless you're using a particular template, it might get skipped. So I'm not so confident, because there's a lot more information I needed to put in. In any case, I think that whatever gets done, the documentation for such issues should be more clear. McKay 20:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Response
[edit]In Response to:
{{helpme}}
I looked at WP:RED But still don't know when to leave a redlink. Please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiMan53 (talk • contribs)
- Hi, WikiMan53. I might have a few pointers if you would be willing to let me know which words/phrases in which article(s) you are referring to? —XhantarTalk 20:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
If you look at my editor reveiw you will see. Thanks Please respond on my talk WikiMan53 (talk • contribs • count) Review Me! 04:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]It worked great. Thanks much! --ktoonen 23:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktoonen (talk • contribs)
How to join project?
[edit][moved from User page] How can I be on the project AJ 19:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agwin12193 (talk • contribs)
- Hi there! If you meant WikiProject Wikify, just read its project page at WP:WWF. It has all the details you need about how to join. Thanks for your interest! —XhantarTalk 18:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
How do I complain about Harassment?
[edit]A user 1Canuck2 / Peeldog / Al Macloed has successfully removed my company from Wikipedia. I created over a dozen articles about motion capture and listed my company. Several other manufacturers also listed their products and all I did was to make sure their claims were reasonable. This user removed my company and then created several sock puppets to make me look bad and stupid (ok I helped with the making me look stupid by over reacting a few times, but I at least took that in stride and tried to fix my mistakes.) Now he's continuing the charade externally using wikipedia to show that several users here (which I think are all him) are fighting against me on my own talk page. http://forums.mocap.ca/viewtopic.php?t=92. I admit defeat in trying to promote my company, but I object to being singled out and our competition and 1Canuck2/Peeldog/Alastair Macleod being allowed to promote his company. Go ahead and ban me from being here for blanking my page (which doesn't matter since they can just look at the history), but at least keep the playing field level. He is making money by promoting himself as an expert here, and denying our existence. Tmcsheery 05:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please note that I am not an administrator. To answer your question, though: please read WP:HARASS. For reporting suspected sock puppets, please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. If you feel you are being harassed, please post to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. For disputes or arguments about article content, please use the dispute resolution process. —XhantarTalk 10:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Help?
[edit]Xhantar: If you are so inclined, could you please visit this discussion and offer your opinion to the debate there? Thanks. Labyrinth13 03:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
GR promoted to FA
[edit]I don't know whether you've looked at Gwoyeu Romatzyh recently, but it was promoted to FA earlier today. Many thanks indeed for your thoughtful comments on the article, which have helped us bring it up to FA standard. All the best, --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 11:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Please join a deletion review
[edit]Hi there. You were kind enough to edit and work with me on the Still_Pending article a few months back. You asserted that the article seemed to have proper references and notability. The article was the subject of an AfD and was subsequently deleted. I never had a chance to participate in the discussion. Would you like to join the deletion review discussion? I would appreciate it. The deletion review is here: WP:DRV#Still_Pending. Stampsations 04:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikimania 2007
[edit]Hi Xhantar
Wikimania 2007, which is being held in Taipei, Taiwan on August 3-5, is offering opportunities for travel scholarships to Wikimania for active users of Wikimedia projects from the continent of Africa. Although the original scholarship deadline has passed, please, if you are interested, you may still apply at http://wm07schols.wikimedia.org/apply.php. Sincerely yours, Cary Bass 21:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Still Pending AFD Discussion
[edit]Hello Xhantar. You have been helpful in my understanding of Wiki in the past, so I look to you again for assistance. An article which I originally created for Still Pending was recently the subject of a speedy delete. The delete was subsequently overturned Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_April_17. It has now been nominated again (less than a month since the overturn), this time in AFD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Still_Pending_(2nd). I don't really understand how an article that failed to be deleted due to notability is now the subject of deletion review yet again. Can anyone nominate an article for AFD any time they wish, even if the article hasn't substantially changed since the previous overturn? Perhaps you can shed some light on how this works. Also, please feel free to join the discussion, if you wish. Thank you. Stampsations 22:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Afrikaans
[edit]I noticed on your userpage that you are a native speaker of Afrikaans. Could you help me make one template? Please translate the following text into Afrikaans:
This user is able to contribute with a professional level of Afrikaans.
Thank you. --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 16:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Would you be interrested in jioning afrikaans wikipedia? i know you would be alot of help--Bezuidenhout (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
South African Wikimedia Chapter
[edit]Hi there. The idea of setting up a local Wikimedia chapter has been discussed by South African Wikipedians (and those associated with other Wikimedia projects) for some time now, and we want to help turn this dream into a reality. There are currently over 25 chapters established around the world, and several more planned and being discussed, but so far, none in Africa. A South African chapter, should it become a reality, would be a continental first. If you're interested in being involved in the creation of a South African Wikimedia Chapter, we'd love to hear from you and at this stage could you email me directly. Thanks and look forward to hearing from you, Kaydee 68 (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
South African Wikimedia Chapter update and mailing list
[edit]Hi there. Local Wikipedians have set up a mailing list where we will be discussing the formation of a local Wikimedia Chapter in South Africa. Please join the mailing list at this url https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza. There is also a page set up on Meta where you can add your name if you're interested to take this idea forward. Check out http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_South_Africa. Thanks Kaydee 68 (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Brooke Dolan
[edit]You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Brooke Dolan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. M4gnum0n (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Please confirm your membership
[edit]This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify. You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify. Thank you for your support, WikiProject Wikify |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC).
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Inviting you to WikiAfrica Incubator!
[edit]Hey Xhantar,
WikiAfrica invites you to support the Africa Incubator.
WikiAfrica is pleased to invite you as a self-declared African Wikipedian to evaluate the Africa Incubator. WikiAfrica has created the Africa Incubator to support and assist new authors, as they create their first articles and learn the ins and outs of contributing to Wikipedia.
The Africa Incubator is a ‘soft landing’ for new authors to develop articles that relate to Africa. It assists them in becoming compliant and knowledgeable of Wikipedia principles and rules. Based within the Wikipedia framework, the Africa Incubator is fully interactive and enables feedback, assistance and forums.
This is where we need your help! For the Africa Incubator to be successful, it needs the intervention, interaction and experience of Incubator Mentors. We are looking for a pool of active experienced Wikipedians to consistently participate in ’owning’ the Africa Incubator. Incubator Mentors will assist new comers through the editing process. They will also help test and expand the Africa Incubator, and will play a vital role in encouraging newcomers to be Wikipedians for life
Please visit WikiAfrica Incubator to give us your honest feedback and evaluation. WikiAfrica is a ground-breaking project that is designed to Africanise Wikipedia by generating and expanding 30,000 articles over two years. Find out more about this project here WikiAfrica. To get involved, contact Francis [wikipedian@wikiafrica.net] Twitter: twitter.com/#!/wikiafrica Facebook: www.facebook.com/WikiAfrica --Awinda 13:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awinda (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Nurturant parent model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Responsibility (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa
[edit]Hello,
I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.
If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/
Best regards, Islahaddow
(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Table View Primary School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Xhantar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Xhantar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Xhantar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Henry Clay High School logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)