User talk:Xfiles82

Hello, Xfiles82! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bidgee (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Bidgee (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Solar cell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oz Football Team 2008 page

Hi. Don't worry, there's no typo. I just haven't uploaded the images onto Wikipedia yet for those games. I don't really know when it'll happen, but soon, I guess. If you want to learn how to make and upload the images yourself, well here's a link to a previous message I gave to another user, who also wanted to know. (Talk:Australia_national_football_(soccer)_team_season_2007#Formation SVGs)

By the way, I'm not sure how I feel about the way you changed the titles on the page. You're entitled to make changes but, in my opinion, it doesn't look very organised. Perhaps you can add the added information for each match as a link under each title. Rather than in the title itself. Blackjanedavey (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Odd page moves

Hi there...can I please ask why you have been moving pages from X to Y, and then immediately back from Y to X? Giant Snowman 12:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's so non accented versions of people's names, or alternate versions, link to the actual page. This is both so some links which dont have the accents, actually link to the page and also so people who search for the names without the accents or search for someone's name as say, 'Steve Something' as opposed to 'Steven Something' are still linked to that person or place. I found it frustrating with some unusual 'red links' where one presumed there be an entry or some entry's that use the accents or certain versions of the name and so spelling, or versions of that name that may be familiar with may not find it. AND I didn't move proper as I recognise that the accents are also acceptable, deemed as correct and that some people may search or link pages with those versions of the name/place too. Basically I wanted to create what I saw as needed redirect options for those entrys. BTW It's the only way I know how to do this. If there is another way of doing this, then please direct me to it.Xfiles82 (talk) 09:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's a much easier way! I'll use a fake article to show you. Say an article is located at José Acuña, and you want to create a redirect from Jose Acuna. Simply edit the latter, non-accented page with a code such as #REDIRECT [[José Acuña]] and save - much quicker, easier and safer! Any more problems/queries then just ask! Giant Snowman 11:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Your addition to Bellamack, Northern Territory has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Ergic

I´ll post that question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football‎ and let them decide, OK? FkpCascais (talk) 22:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and I guess I'm satisfied with your 'Australian Citizenship' addition. Xfiles82 (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, please don´t think that I like revering you or something, but, we can´t really say "birthplace" for Serbia, because the place where he was born, Šibenik, was Yugoslavia, back then, but allways part of Croatia, thus, not Serbia. What Ergic really is, is a Serb from Croatia (remember the war there in the 1990s? Those Serbs of Croatia wanted to stay with Yugoslavia, and when that territory was back in Croat authority, many emigrated, as Ergic case...). So, that is why "birthplace" is wrong, but you can obviously see another word, if you find more apropriate. Sorry once more, and best regards :) FkpCascais (talk) 19:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:A-League NYL logo.png

I have removed File:A-League NYL logo.png which you added to 2010–11 A-League National Youth League with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is [[1]] wrong then? As it's labelled as complying with the non-free media use rationale you were referring to. Xfiles82 (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale in the summary section of File:A-League NYL logo.png is for the article A-League National Youth League. 2010–11 A-League National Youth League is a separate page and requires a separate rationale. If you want to use a non-free file on X articles, then the file needs X valid rationales. This is required by the policy at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria#Policy 10c. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 08:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Versleijen

I don't trust official sites - I could have an official site and make all sorts of claims about my career, couldn't I? - and there was an AfD a few months back (I can't remember the link, sorry) where we found out that the guy had lied extensively on his official website, claiming to have managed throughout Holland and Iraq. If there are other available sources, why not provide them? Giant Snowman 15:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just the issue is the other sites don't reference the year/time frame he was in those roles, they just say he was. E.g. One of the very articles listed in the present references, when his appointment was announced: http://www.smh.com.au/news/football/versleijen-strengthens-ffas-oranje-flavour/2008/06/24/1214073247602.html

"Versleijen, 53, has previously coached at club level in the Netherlands, Japan and across the Middle East, whilst his experience also extends to the Dutch national set-up, where he previously oversaw the under-17 and under-23 teams."

Here too, same thing: http://www.ausport.gov.au/ais/sports/football_men/coaches

Jan Versleijen (Head Coach)

"Jan joined the AIS in July 2008 as AIS Head Coach and is also National Head Coach for the Australian under-20 and Joeys under-17 teams. Jan has an extensive football record, having played top flight football in Europe and coached in the Netherlands, Asia and the Middle East.

Jan has coached the Dutch under-17 and under-23 teams and has had signficant international experience at senior and youth level with Venlo, Roda and Go Ahead Eagles in the Netherlands, JEF United in Japan, as well as clubs in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia."

I'd reference either of those, but as you see no time frame mentioned for WHEN his Dutch national set-up experience was. It's really quite annoying as it was clearly a strong frame of reference for his appointment to the Australian position in the first place! His official site is the only reference I can see which does, so unless he's fooled everybody, including the FFA (Which is always possible) then I'd take that info on good faith?

Oh look no further than the Dutch version of his page? http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Versleijen They list his brief Dutch set up experience, but it's listed as during 1999 not 2000 but for the same short period and it lists the Under 17s and curiously the Under 19s as opposed to the Under 21s, as being the teams under his control, during that period. I don't understand Dutch but as far as I can see via the format the Dutch version of the page has NO references at all, Dutch or otherwise! But one can presume, given Versleijen is Dutch that the Dutch language page would have to have a tad more info, but we can never be too sure I guess?

But I suppose the circumstantial evidence mounts up?

Sources say U17 + U23, his site says U17 + U21? Dutch Wikipedia (albeit unsourced) says 1999, he says 2000? These ate important differences. See how important proper sourcing is? Giant Snowman 17:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of the importance of this conflicting information of proper sourcing generally, just was not aware of the official site issues. I was just presenting my dilemna and why I chose that source. I certainly would've preferred third party. There are surely Dutch language sources that could clear this up, but I can't find any and don't understand Dutch in any case. Xfiles82 (talk) 17:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Youth available players

These are all the 'Under 20' players, or those qualifying for the 3 designated under 20 places for this season. Both the Asian signings are also young enough, as was mentioned when they were signed - The official site backs this up

Hi, I saw that you recently edited the First Team players section in the Brisbane Roar FC page. Your edits were the removal of the notation of "youth" availability.

Players under 21 signed for the first team filling foreign player spots are classed as over-age players. These players can be any Australian player within the age group. A-League clubs must draw replacement players for their senior teams from the Youth League squad, except under certain circumstances. Such would include severe injuries to over-age players where an injury replacement player is able to be signed.

It states that young enough players filling a foreign Visa spot are classed as "over-age players". You have actually put the notation of availability next to their names, which is the complete opposite of what is actually allowed. Secondly, you have removed the notation of availability from the players that are underage and available for the NYL from the first team, despite their not being any formal rule about those players being outside the availability. Thus, those home grown players in the first team under 21 come the 1st January of the year the NYL season starts ARE available for selection and should have the notation of availability next to their names. --Protenpinner (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, correct where need be, if you are sure you are correct. But in regards to the 'Under 21s' - A-League clubs are still required to sign 'THREE' designated Under 20s each season. The players who I removed were players who WERE in that category, like last season, but wouldn't be amongst the 'THREE' designated Under 21s this season - those others I highlighted WOULD BE. You are correct on the VISA players though and they can be removed.

But anyway, even if A-League clubs have more than three players under 20 in their squad, which is the case for some, like the Jets, they still would only have THREE players registered as 'their 3 Under 20s for that season.' BTW That rule is STILL in effect, as I recall Tony Poppovic saying Wanderers still needed to sign one more Under 20:

A-league#Squad_and_salary_cap The squad must also include at least three under-20 players.Xfiles82 (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kemal Akbaba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kemal Akbaba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemal Akbaba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xfiles82. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xfiles82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Xfiles82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]