User talk:Xevilgeniusx

Sigma Technology

A tag has been placed on Sigma Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Sigma Technology and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike Relic Entertainment, your article was not supported by reliable independent sources showing the notability of the subject per WP:CORP. If you can supply such sources for Sigma Technology, feel free to repost. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Yes, once the article is supported with independent sources, you can repost. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sigma Technology

A tag has been placed on Sigma Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Technology deletion

Deletion review for Sigma Technology

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sigma Technology. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.Xevilgeniusx (talk) 04:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I'll comment there. - jc37 16:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]