User talk:Xery1234

Hello, Xery1234, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 03:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

KCA

Ahh, I see what happened, you wrote Nick at Nite as "NaM", so I thought that was 'nickandmore'. I definitely apologize for mis-reading that. Nate • (chatter) 18:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. :) User:Xery1234 (Also, I apologize for responding late as I thought I had replied.) Xery1234 (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please stop adding things without any sources are unreliable sources, and please stop changing articles to go by packaging order- airdate order is correct and should not be changed from that. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 14:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated documentation reigns supreme! Xery1234 (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why were some of the FOP production codes removed? Some of them were unsourced, which I understand, but a good few of them are from people who work on the show, I don’t get how they aren’t reliable sources either Xery1234 (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you continue to do in your edits (such as here), please do not add unsourced information/change information without a source, whether you believe it is correct or not. If you don't have a source to back it up, it should not be added then. As shown here, the production code in the source is listed as 123-124. Please stop adding unsourced information and do not use original research. Thank you. (P.S.- being warned against adding unsourced information does not mean you are hated- in fact, it is actually attempting to help correct what you are doing.) Magitroopa (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can original model sheets and storyboards be used as a source? Xery1234 (talk) 20:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Politics Xery1234 (talk) 02:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KCA ratings

Please stop changing KCA viewership to different numbers. Viewership should be rounded to only include the first two numbers after the decimal, not the first three, as is usually done. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Xery1234 (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I was doing that is because one of the pages said 5.033m, so I thought it would be good to keep it consistent to that Xery1234 (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably just stick to the first two, as per usual. Obviously there can be exceptions such as the 2009 Kids' Choice Awards, where all the source says is just 7.7, unless another reliable source is found for this. Magitroopa (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Barry Wom. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Simpsons (season 9) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Barry Wom (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure…? And it wasn’t really not constructive, those were alternate codes, since 3G was just part of s7. I’m guessing 3GXX was used in terms of copyright at the end of every episode, while typical 3F was used in boards. Though I won’t say anything else so nothing wacky happens Xery1234 (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpongeBob chocolate milk print-ad, March 2001.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpongeBob chocolate milk print-ad, March 2001.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

rip my image then. I might put it in the Shanghaied article but that means I would have to create a whole new section for it Xery1234 (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SpongeBob chocolate milk print-ad, February 2001.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SpongeBob chocolate milk print-ad, February 2001.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

time for me to yell

why do you like to overcomplicate clear and short synopses Эмиль Нагиев (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean? Xery1234 (talk) 12:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't made that many synopsis changes on Wikipedia. And most of them aren't that complicated. If you're talking about other places (which you should talk to me on said websites) then I'll try to keep them as simple as possible. The one on ESB was my first synopsis I've written, and I will attempt to do better next time (if I plan on doing one, anyway) Xery1234 (talk) 12:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

101 Dalmatians: The Series

For this article, I want you to add the production codes for the second season episodes, as well as some more season 1 codes if you find any. I also want you to add how many viewers each episode got on premiere if you find sources as such. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find any viewers, (the show aired in synd. for its 2nd season, and I don't know where to find at least a basic type of rating system for the ABC exclusive first) but I can definitely help add more prod. codes. Xery1234 (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The production codes season 2 are on WebVoyage, as with the first season codes I found. Not that not all codes are on that website and some coded episodes may not have revealed titles, but if you find another source with more of the codes, I will count on it. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Johnny Test episodes

I noticed that you added the accessibility tables for the second season. If so, can you please do the same for the rest of the series? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, sure Xery1234 (talk) 01:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, I'm pretty much done formatting, so I guess you can check that out. Xery1234 (talk) 02:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	astrounding contributions, spectacular i'd say, ingenious even Эмиль Нагиев (talk) 08:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh I know who you are. Very funny pal Xery1234 (talk) 09:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tiny Toon Adventures episodes

With the release of Tiny Toons Looniversity, can you please add the production codes for Tiny Toon Adventures episodes with reliable sources to back up? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure pal, they're on the 'old copyright catalog so I can add 'em Xery1234 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

101 Dalmatian Street

Is there any viewership data available for the episodes from "Fetch" to "Dawkins Strikes Back"? The ratings should come from the USTVDB and Nielsen ratings reports. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of PAW Patrol episodes

I had asked Alex 21 to reformat the list but has not responded. Since you can reformat lists, can you please do so with this article. The formatting should be much like its spin-off, Rubble & Crew. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it's fine honestly. It doesn't need to be organized in broadcast order because it appears to be going off the Canadian airdates, making it easy to understand (plus it's in packaging order, which is actually pretty convenient and honestly the way episodes should really be sequenced). The ordering may be outdated but considering it's been listed like that for ages, it should just be left as is (like the SpongeBob episode list) as so not to confuse people reading the page. I also don't want to do NumParts formatting for it, that takes way too long to do and isn't an enjoyable process. Last of all, I am really not dedicating myself to a show I don't even like or have any interest in, I mean I can do like 5 edits to help out with some basic information, but I have no reason to do formatting that would take hours for 1 out of 10 parts alone Xery1234 (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Pony (TV series) Directors

Alright, so I tried finding everywhere who directed each episode of the original MLP series but I can't find any results. Sure the credits lists all directors but I highly doubt that all directors directed one episode at once. Since you do find very interesting lesser-known but reliable sources, will you please find out who directed each episode of the show? I'm especially interested since Looney Tunes director Norman McCabe is one of the directors involved with the show. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 05:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, there isn't enough coverage on this topic for me to do anything about it. Norm McCabe's IMDb page doesn't even have him listed there (though I did check the actual credits, and he was) so I think it's kind of a lost cause. After all this was a show from the 80s, and most animated shows from this time period have he exact same issues Xery1234 (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chip 'n' Dale: Park Life episodes

I wonder if you could update this list by adding in the NumParts table and make sure the individual segments of each episode are combined into actual half-hours, after all, it was released like this on Disney+. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xery1234 (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Best & Bester

Surprised you haven't made any edit this year. Anyways this is a draft I have been doing checks on for a good amount of time not wanting to be deleted. I didn't create it, but I had been doing lots of development and research, though mainly for the episodes. Because it is still a draft I couldn't get chances to do more improvements on, will you add in more improvements for me. If its good enough to be notable for Wikipedia I may submit it. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 08:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Xery1234 (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Fairly OddParents episodes

Can you please update the formatting of the season article with the NumParts table? An episode of A New Wish was leaked, and while it is 22 minutes, the ending credits confirm two other episodes that are likely 11 minutes. Since the NumParts formatting is the new norm on episode lists, will you update the formatting for me? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a leaked photo for the first four episodes of the show, that was the half-four special first episode, the other three episodes that I know about are 11 mins. And ok, sure Xery1234 (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Where in the credits did you find the production codes for A New Wish? I looked into the episode credits but I don’t see any indication of codes. If there are codes in the credits, please tell me what part of the credits the codes are seen at. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 06:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the original airings of episodes, codes are in the credits. I watched the premiere of "A Dinosaur in Dimmadelphia" it said CAST (actual prefix is FOP) 006 for this ep, and CAST 004 for Fearless. Xery1234 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you can find them in the official digital releases, I know this because I checked the leaked version of "Fly" and the credits are missing the real codes. Xery1234 (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rating source for The Flintstones

It looks like you added the Nielsen audience sizes to The Flintstones episodes from Google Drive scans of the Nielsen rating logs. The Ratings Ryan website used to have those and the same for later '60s seasons and the data from the 1970s on in a different format. His website went down in mid-late May, having last been updated as recently as early May and there's been no sign of activity other than a few forums asking what happened to that website. While the Internet Wayback Machine has his website archived, it does not have the contents of the pages archived because they were stored in unarchived formats, like an in-set container for the pdf scans or in a multi-tabbed spreadsheet. It seemed like all that archived information was lost until I saw Flintstones here on Wikipedia had the actual audience sizes listed and linked to what I saw his website also used to provide ratings. What you linked could provide audience sizes and Nielsen ratings for any number of series- Gilligan's Island, Munsters, Addams Family, Bewitched, etc for other Wikipedia editors to add to those series' pages (at least to mid April of each pre-1967 season since those scans leave out anything past that).Unfortunately, Flintstones ended in 1966, so the many series active in 1966-67, like Star Trek, Batman, Gilligans' Island, et al can't have their full records accessed from what is linked to on the Flintstones page.

So I ask, do you know the links on Google Drive to later tv seasons, particularly 1966-67, 67-68?

BTW. No matter what, it's appreciated what you added to The Flintstones page. Every vintage tv series should have Nielsen ratings & audience size listed next to its episode info. 76.136.164.141 (talk) 01:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

66-67: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hDRfsUrtnYPmQv3ZwnXwCElP_7fIEc_e/view

67-68: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19-ARGn6DUoXO6davlGVbThCRuyrEEbrP/view

68-69: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JiB4lPmsFcmM8aVda8nLv-aEJ1D7bMYM/view

70-71:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qaCPttSJrpeEQBrbRbw2et5Oz5XOqYWr/view Xery1234 (talk) 02:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

72-73: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vrsdh3yG5CAMDBpSUfjx1qtip6DbLdgH/view (finalized data)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Go_o11gYr_EmB-Y9UqFBromZLLkjYFLA/view (newspaper archives - "fast national" data that uses demical points that you have to multiply by 648,000)

73-74: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AuLr5cAjfyi9cY6uWIknxyYDo6SQWiPi/view Xery1234 (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you. Hopefully others can find these links if they want the data. 76.136.164.141 (talk) 03:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]