User talk:Xela Yrag

Talk to me!!!

WikiThanks

Here's a little WikiThanks for your edits fixing grammar, spelling, style, and consistency. It's nice to have someone clearing the RS series pages of elementary errors (which were quite numerous might I add). Hyenaste ^(tell)

Welcome

↓ Everyone else has one of these, so why not you, too?

Welcome!

Hello, Xela Yrag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! and i love runescape yay!!!!!!!!! wooot go fletch and mage!!!!! emo kid898

Reverting

If you haven't already found it yourself, Help:Reverting. Cheers, Hyenaste ^(tell) 22:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Thank You

Well it looks like Hyenaste has praised you before I could talk to you, But everyone at the RuneScape Series of Articles would like to praise you for your necessary minor edits to the RuneScape Series. Thanks again and we wish you well at Wikipedia. Kind Regards, J.J.Sagnella 16:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope everyone still thanks me when they see what I have done to the Armour and Mining articles. Of course, I think they're are now fantastic, but I'm insecure so I need affirmation. Xela Yrag 17:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Mining (RuneScape)

I'm perfectly happy with it, but I'm just wondering why you removed my edit to that article. It didn't look like a repetitive sentence, especially since it wasn't talking about the non-binding custom (first sentence) or the mithril thing (second), but a new point that most players share and it is considered rude to steal (which wasn't stated before).

Anyway, just wondering why. Bronzey 08:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, saw the edit, thanks again for reconsidering. Nice job on the rest of the RuneScape articles as well, keep up the good edits. Bronzey 09:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barrows armour...

No problem. However, with it being too good to be true; It still isn't free. I think it gets less expencive the higher your construction level is, I am not sure if it is ever free though. I am not a huge barrows person though, so don't take my word for granted on this ;P Clq 19:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you repair barrows armor in your POH.. Well let me put it this way. If you're at level 1 smithing it would be the same price as if you had an npc do it. If you're at level 99 smithing, it would be half price.

bloody should be free to fix armour in your own house!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i mean you cant charge your self so who is the money going to i mean you brought the house its yours and you made the reapir bench so who the heck is getting all that money!!!!!!!!! i repeat it is your house your stuff and your bench and still you have to pay !! why!!!!! emo kid898

A Barnstar for You!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I award this barnstar to Xela Yrag for her tireless contributions to RuneScape related articles and for proving me wrong on the number of RS servers – Htmlguy716 23:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar of Appreciation

Thank you so much for helping me in that adverts section of RuneScape. As you can see in the discussion page, there is currently an effort to clean-up the newly added sections of Advertising and Press Reviews. You can help!--Ed 19:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		I hereby award you, Xela Yrag, this Minor Barnstar for your very minor, but notable, edits in the Advertising section of RuneScape.--Ed 19:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve another one!----Ed^{talk c E} 17:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Diligence

I hereby award Xela Yrag this Barnstar of Diligence for her continuing valuable contributions to the article RuneScape.--Ed^{talk c E} 17:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Construction

Hey Xela, Ive been gone for 2 weeks and when I retruned the construction article was gone! They whittled a whole page of info into 2 paragraphs! I posted something on the skills page, but only VIndaloo has responded as of yet (yipee...) and I would appreciate some answers- oh btw Hyenaste deleted it.Merlin Storm 02:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construction (RuneScape) The discussion took place in 15 min. bt/w Ed and Hyenaste. No other people involved. kinda 1-sided, doncha think?Merlin Storm 01:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

You claim to be a punctuation stickler. Have you read this book?Hemhem20X6 05:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!Hemhem20X6 22:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Hemhem20X6 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

The Wall Street Journal

Why did you remove the WSJ references in RuneScape. I don't know what you meant by subscription-only, but if you followed the link to the main article, it should work fine.--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 12:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Essay

Oh Goddess, thank you Xela! I owe you one! or two! or three! or 390445896070957! or...

Removed for privacy reasons, ty again! Merlin Storm 03:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Welcome back to Wikipedia Xela Yrag, we missed you! J.J.Sagnella 19:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Want to join WikiProject RuneScape?

I noticed you recently made a number of very helpful edits to RuneScape, and I was thinking that you might want to join the WikiProject. We could really use the help of people like you in improving the article to GA status. --Pyrospirit ^{Talk Contribs} 03:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puring

What you removed is criticism not an opinion..Wtf?

Well, I can't answer you on your own talk page since you neglected to sign your post (which is very rude IMHO), so I'll just say it here. Criticism is usually an opinion. The criticisms we use, positive or negative, must be documented and cited. Just because you do or do not like something doesn't make it worthy to be stated in an encyclopedic article. Xela Yrag 21:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for your message on my talk page.

I've made some mistakes recently, too many, the last one left me feeling angry at first since I thought I'd done the right thing. In fact I hadn't, I was wrong. For whatever reason, instead of simply apologizing and getting on with things, I started to get paranoid about my work on the WP - that I was simply causing work for others.

Truth is I still have a lot to learn, need more experience with different aspects of the project and need to focus on exactly how I can help with the RS series. This should have been my line of thought, instead of the irrational mental free-wheeling, god only knows what happened there.

Sorry if I've come across as vying for attention or seeking recognition for the limited impact I've had on WP, it wasn't the intention. I seem to have a handle on this now, and intend to get back in the saddle and carry on. The fansite issue in particular is something I'd like to settle for the forseeable future. Thanks. --QuagmireDog 09:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Just wanted to let you know that I'm back on RS. We should get together sometime- it's lonely w/out you ;)- User: Merlin Storm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.40.238.93 (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Used To Have Another Username...

...but I changed it to this one. Do I have your permission to remove the reference to my old username, and then to remove this? Rocio Nadat 02:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi Xela!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Xela Yrag! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Xela Yrag! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xela Yrag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]