User talk:Xcueta

Extended content

Welcome to Wikipedia Welcome! Hello, Xcueta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Allen4names 04:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC) January 2011 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Special education. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Xcueta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I did discuss on the talk page. The other user was the only who disagreed. I wasn't going against consensus as no other person besides that other user opposed. The other user is forcing me to edit war (Fine, I admit it was entirely my fault and that I should have acted more responsibly. I will go on the talk page and seek consensus first before making changes to the article.) And I have discussed on the talk page and no other user besides that user disagreed. I'm sorry for edit warring. Please give me another chance. If you unblock me, I won't edit war anymore and will use dispute resolution if there is a disagreement. Xcueta (talk) 3:22 am, Yesterday (UTC−5) Decline reason: Your block has expired. TNXMan 15:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. As the admin who blocked you I won't be the one reviewing this, but you are going to have to do a lot better than "The other user is forcing me to edit war." At least you do acknowledge you were edit warring, that is something, just not enough. See WP:NOTTHEM. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Xcueta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Jessica was not banned for edit warring. How is this a duck case? Decline reason: Huh? Jessica was banned for sockpuppetry (among other things) and that's what you're blocked for too. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Xcueta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I should take consequences for my actions which was edit-warring. Why should Jessica be punished for what I did? I didn't create multiple accounts. I only have this account. Please give me another chance. It's not fair. I don't know Jessica at all. So how can I impersonate her? The article was not protected and I have made good edits after my first block for edit warring. Please tell me what I did wrong with my edits because I don't see anything wrong with my edits after my first block. I made useful contributions after my first block. Decline reason: You are kind of all over the map with this request. Let us be clear, you are blocked for being the same user as User:Random account 39949472. Nothing more, nothing less. As such this request can't be accepted because it does not address that point.Beeblebrox (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. I added citation needed to the information because the source did not provide that. The other user keeps saying that I'm pushing my own personal preferences which is not true. Another editor agreed with me and added citation needed. Other users assumed good faith on me but how come WhatamIdoing and Jimsteele9999 do not have to? Please look at my case again. Xcueta (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Xcueta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I understand that there are some users who think that I may be Jessica (Random account 39949472). But the majority of other users do not. Suspected sockpuppets should still have strong evidence. You are basing your evidence on what two people may think who have strong objections to Jessica. If these two didn't seem to care, no one else would. Decline reason: See SPI page. Toddst1 (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. User talk:WhatamIdoing#issue They obviously have something against Jessica. It's not nice. That's just allowing harassment to continue of Jessica. How do you think Jessica would feel if others were being blocked because of her? Anyway, the source that WhatamIdoing added by reverting because of this block is wrong. The information is original research and does not display what the source is saying. It is clear that WhatamIdoing is only reverting because of any similarities to Jessica. This is just harassment, really. Xcueta (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

• I have re-blocked you without the ability to edit this page. Please email WP:BASC with any further requests. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)