User talk:Xchunksx

xchunksx

[1] '''== El Fresno Michoacan Mexico De Ocampo ==

     Media:Mexico Michoacan,;El Fresno
    
This I's a village that contain lots of well and good expresion.

Media:El Fresno was built Next to Jiquilpan and by Media:Los Tavanos in the year 1930's

and still keeps on building for its self it gots almost evetythiing such as School Market

Homes and A Game Corner to play soccer and most of the infants stuff so its a great thing to

visit that place so have your time and go pass it.

title

Pleace Visit My Page @ Panoramio.com or Send Me an E-Mail @

Media:xchunksx_18@yahoo.com [2]

Problems with upload of File:Xchunksx.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Xchunksx.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Xchunksx, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Xchunksx. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poncho Macias

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poncho Macias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:El Fresno.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:El Fresno.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Bkell (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because your images are already online at Panoramio with a full claim of copyright, they cannot be used at Wikipedia until and unless you use one of the methods set out at Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials#Granting_us_permission_to_copy_material_already_online to grant Wikipedia the right to use them. Just putting the {{own}} template is not enough and the images will be deleted if you do not do follow those procedures. Note, however, that following those instructions will, in effect, give everyone in the world the right to use your images. There is nothing you can do, at least nothing which Wikipedia will accept, which will allow Wikipedia to use your images, but no one else. The reason for that is Wikipedia's policy and philosophy that everyone in the world ought to be able to copy and use everything that is on Wikipedia. Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Xchunksx. Thank you for adding licensing information to File:El Fresno.jpg by adding the {{cc-by-2.0}} tag. However, the source page on Panoramio [3] still says, "© All Rights Reserved by Poncho_El Fresno" and has no mention of a Creative Commons license.

We need the source page to confirm that this image has been released as claimed. As stated in the link posted by TransporterMan above, "One simple way to grant permission to copy material already on line is to put that permission explicitly on the site where that material is posted." If this really is your Panoramio page, please update the status there to indicate that you have released the image under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, and then all the licensing hassles here will be cleared up.

If for some reason you do not want to change the licensing information on the Panoramio page, you will need to follow the two steps outlined at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online for submitting evidence of licensing through the OTRS system:

From an address associated with the original publication to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org;
Then … place {{OTRS pending}} on the image page.

Let me know if you need help or have any questions. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 05:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:El Fresno.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:El Fresno.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does need a license. Just because you said you took the picture means nothing. Anybody can claim they took the picture. Without proper licensing, it's liable to get removed. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing information missing for File:El Fresno.jpg, again

Hi, Xchunksx. I see you've uploaded two new versions of File:El Fresno.jpg since my last message here, but the fundamental problem has not been solved. The current file description page does not contain a copyright tag indicating what license the image has been released under. "Own work" is not a license. If you are the photographer, and you do agree to allow anyone to use, redistribute, and modify this photograph for any purpose, please edit the file description page and add a tag such as {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} (which indicates that you agree to license the photograph under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license). Please let me know if you need help or have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a word of clarification: Because your most recent image has not, as far as I can tell, been used previously on the Internet (if it has, or if you didn't shoot the picture, then what I'm about to say is not correct), then all you have to do is to follow Bkell's instructions above and you will not have to go to the trouble of doing what it says at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online. If you don't at least do that much, however, your image will almost certainly be deleted for lack of proper licensing. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 22:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]