User talk:Xavthius/Archive 2

Question

Hey, I scanned that prayer letter. Where would you like me to upload it to? I've got it as a jpg right now. I think it's about time to finally put that to rest. Gatorgalen 05:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try http://imageshack.us/ Xanthius 05:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voila! [1]. Have a good day Gatorgalen 18:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Xanthius 03:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anonymous

Hey, just FYI - I honestly don't share the beliefs of the anon guy that commented on the GCA talk page recently. I'm guessing you and ClaudeReigns are dudes from Decomm, but so am I - and I can sympathize with some of the stuff there. Please believe that his viewpoint is not the only one in GC. Things ARE changing. I blushed when I read his comment, because I'm sure he reinforced a stereotype. I'm sure we can all work together to make a legitimate, honest, balanced, high-quality article. I'm going to post this on Claude's talk page too. Have a great day! Nswinton\^talk 13:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I hope everyone in GCA can work together too. Xanthius 02:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey Xanthius

Hi there, I would just like you to have a peep at the Potter's House page. I noticed you did some editing there and since then user Darrenss, who is a fomer church member, continues to delete links and make the page as negative as possible. He also goes through and edits against anything to do with the church always in a negative way, like Wayman Mitchell and Harold Warner etc. I suppose this is bias. Anyway just thought I would drop you a line and point that out. Sapienz 10:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only just now seeing this. Yes, I will try to give it a look soon. Am pretty busy but I will do what I can. Xanthius 02:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Violation

I finally got the time to report your 3RR violation on the 20th/21st, so I am notifying you. [2]. Please in the future do not combine separately substantive edits. Gatorgalen 16:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History Re-write

Hey,

I'm going to wikify and insert the rewrite of the History section on the Great Commission church movement article soon. I notices that you still haven't commented on that rewrite on the talk page. I don't want to leave you out, and I'd like to have your thoughts before I make the edit this time. Please give your opinion either way sooner rather than later. Nswinton\^talk 21:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Xanthius 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contact?

Is there a way to contact you outside of wikipedia? No need to give away personal info, an email address would be fine. I'd like to talk, but not here. Nswinton\^talk 12:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um..... maybe? Why do you want to contact me outside of wikipedia? Xanthius 02:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DonBarnett.png

Thanks for uploading Image:DonBarnett.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DonBarnett.png

Xanthius,

I'm the one that supplied you with the image, and as far as I know it was never copyrighted. I think it is fine being on Wikipedia. I believe you mislabled it as being a "promotional" image. It was from the cover of the church bulletins which was for informational purposes only, were distributed free to all visitors of Community Chapel's Sunday morning services, and contained no copyright notices. Also, Community Chapel has not existed as a corporation or body of any kind for nearly twenty years now.

--Steve Born, Seattle, WA 19:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah.. if you want you can try to defend it, or re-add it under different rationale. I've given up trying to argue with wikipedia's image copyright police... Xanthius 15:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an issue for me - the photo was not important to the article and was quite dated anyway.

--Steve Born, Seattle, WA 17:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CultProofingYourKids.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CultProofingYourKids.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Just saw your message

Was only talking about the Larry Pile letter, not the rest of the site.. Xanthius 05:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Churches That Abuse Cover.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Churches That Abuse Cover.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Infinitelink

[oops: I forgot that I already replied to your post on my page earlier. Sorry! : )]