User talk:XavierD75

Isabel dos Santos

Bem, bem, bem. Portanto, como dizem os ingleses, "we agree not to agree". Então, qual é o critério para decidir o que fica no texto? Aflis (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aflis: Na minha opinião devem constar no texto os feitos de qualquer biografado, neste caso, por se tratar de uma empresária, penso que o importante será melhorar partes do artigo relativas aos investimentos. Concordo consigo quando afirma que algum background é necessário, contudo, discordo que dizer que o casal teve três filhos seja informação relevante e parece-me mesmo ser informação do foro pessoal.--XavierD75 (talk) 11:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Olhe que em Angola (e talvez não só) a sociedade e as média exigem no caso das figuras públicas que aquilo que em tese seria do foro pessoal seja conhecido. Portanto, somos obrigados a decidir, biografado por biografado, até que ponto desenvolvemos a "background info". No caso da Isabel dos Santos, o facto dela ter uma "família nucleafr" consrituída parece-me relevante. Aflis (talk) 19:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Por mim concordo que quantas crianças o casal tem ou se as deixou de ter não e conteúdo para uma enciclopédia e sim para uma revista semanal daquelas que depois se desmancha para usar as folhas para forrar o fundo da gaiola do passarinho. Esse tipo de informação apenas abre a porta aos editores menos sérios a virem acrescentar um monte de porcaria sobre as três crianças. Quem por cá já há muito anda sabe disso. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusão: "Let´s agree not to agree"....Aflis (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reversed your edits (again) noting repeatsd efforts to excise the Forbes magazine investigation of Isabel dos Santos from the list of article references. It makes no sense to prominently cite Forbes as a source on her net worth while excluding the well-founded criticisms from that same magazine. I realize Ms. dos Santos is striving for legitimacy, but please discontinue with this vigilant whitewashing. Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel dos Santos

XavierD75, even though the Wikipedia is different languages are independent, your behaviour across projects can and will be taken together to assess your contributions here. Right now you are very close to be blocked for persistently trying to aggrandise Isabel dos Santos (and her father) and by repeatedly removing negative information about her. Please take this warning seriously. About this specific edit, please understand that the information about Sonangol belongs at Sonangol, not here. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Isabel dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, XavierD75. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]