User talk:Xaverius

Oie, gratias ob oculos tuos perperspicientes! Vandali solent pueruli esse, invidi zelotypi. Viri aerumnas fert coram, vandali autem cacat. Gratias, etiam!--Ioshus^(talk) 13:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Alsonso Zayas

Medievalista, how are you? I believe that I have never had the pleasure of interacting with you before. I wrote the Zayas article and found your edit very interesting. After further studying various official documents, I have come to the conclusion that you were right. I made the changes which point to the actual facts. Thank you Tony the Marine 01:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you in Oxford still?

Notice you have userbox Oxonian. Could you go to the Ashmolean and take a photo of the Domitianus coin, to replace Image:Domitianus coin.jpg, which may soon be deleted for not being fair use. Thanks! Neddyseagoon - talk 13:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new Oxbridge user box

Medievalista...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 16:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schiller translation

Saw you were starting to translate Schiller's "An die Freude" to Latin in the Vicipedia. Looks good so far. I hope to read your finished translation in the future. James470 (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do my best, but I just was trying to translate a bit, I didn't intend to translate the whole text.--Xave ri us 13:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't mean to push you to finish that translation. Hopefully other people can finish it if you don't have time to do so. I couldn't do it, though, my knowledge of Latin is pretty much limited to the best known specimen of ecclesiastical Latin. James470 (talk) 00:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Armen Firman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Armen Firman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armen Firman. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help on map of Visigothic Spain

Hi, Medievalista! I'm currently in a project of making maps in svg format to cover almost the history of Portugal and Spain. I'm simply an amateur and history lover, so my maps are based in what I found in the Internet and books, searching for the most credible. I crossed with one of your maps, [1], but I have some doubts about it, which I ask your help to clarify them:

Why you added Carpetania and Celtiberia to the province of Carthaginensis? Are they sub-regions of this province?
Toletum is in Carpetania, so being the capital of the Visigothic Kingdom, certainly is capital of the province of Carpetania. Is my assumption correct? So, Carthaginensis is a separate province?
Cantabria and Basconia are separate provinces or one of them is a sub-region of the other? Which is which?
Can you tell me the capital of each visigothic province? I want to add them to my map.
Is this map accurate? Or there are doubts about the visigothic administrative division?

My intention isn't to replace the existing maps, like yours. But you are free to view and use the maps I made so far. You can see them in my user page. Thank you. Alcides Pinto (talk)22:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, Alcides. I hope I can answer your questions properly:

- Carpetania and Celtiberia were the traditional regions of central Iberia in Roman times. During the Visigothic period it seems that they were created as different areas splitting the Carthaginensis when this was controled by the Byzantines, with capitals in Toledo and Reccopolis, although it is not clear if they were ever truly independent administrative regions.
- The capital of Carthaginensis was Cartagena, but the city was destroyed in the 620's by king Swinthila, although previously the ecclesiastical capital had been moved from there to Toledo (in 610), because until then the ecclesiastical capital of the province in which the visigothic kingdom was, was controled by the Byzantines (i.e. Cartagena). As a suggestion you may want to add Cartagena as a destroyed city indicating the date, in your map.
- Cantabria and Basconia/Vasconia were two duchies created in the late seventh century, isnide the province of Tarraconensis.
- The capitals of the provinces are the following:
  - Lusitania, Mérida
  - Baetica, Seville (later moved to Córdoba)
  - Carthaginensis, Cartagena (NB what I told you above)
  - Tarraconensis, Tarragona
  - Gallaecia, Braga

These were the capitals of the old Roman ecclesiastical provinces. The capitals of the purely administrative duchies, I'm not sure. But it maybe that Pamplona was the capital of Basconia and Auca that of Cantabria

- The map is accurate as far a I know, but there is the problem regarding the continuity of provinces as a Roman administrative and Ecclesiastical divission and the new duchies that emerged as administrative divisions during the Gothic period.

Lastly, my map is a poor, .png map, even if widely used, a vector image could be better. If you show me your map and let me help you in the design, maybe it would be better if your image substitutes my old one!--Xave ri us 12:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello Medievalista. It's been a long time since we talked, but finally I concluded my vector map based on your map and comments. Surprisingly, I couldn't replace your file (it gave an error - MIME type not supported), so I uploaded a brand new file. You can see it in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iberia_700.svg. I have some remarks for which I call your help (again):

The administrative borders of your map are not accurate and I don't know if these followed the course of the main rivers. Please tell me if they are more or less correct.
I put the comment you proposed for the city of Cartagena, but can you tell me when the capital of Baetica moved from Seville to Córdoba? I can put a comment also in these cities.
As you can see, all the cities have the Visigothic and current name (unless they are the same). Please tell me if they are correct.
I don't have the administrative capitals for Asturias, Cantabria and Vasconia, as you said they are unknown.

Please feel free to comment and suggest any change. Many thanks for your collaboration.

Alcides Pinto (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xaverius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xaverius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Xaverius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oxford University Handball Club

The article Oxford University Handball Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this meets wp notability standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Oxford University Handball Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oxford University Handball Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford University Handball Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Please note that I have completed the nomination as a courtesy on behalf of the anonymous IP who tagged the article and I have made no judgement of my own at this time. Thank you for your understanding. --Finngall ^talk 21:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]