Jump to content

User talk:XangelMusic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Xangel)

Welcome...

Hello, Xangel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Paxse 14:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paxse 14:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving and Merging of articles

[edit]

There is a Maná article that has been created called ¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? (Special Edition). By conventions, original album articles should only contain the original album and if there are any edited editions of the original album it can be mentioned on the main article itself. This is my point here in regards to the article above and I hope that what i said this is true in the conventions. I want to merge ¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? (Special Edition) to ¿Dónde Jugarán Los Niños? which is the main article at the moment.

Another point to make is that ¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? is now a REDIRECT article instead of the main article. I would like to move ¿Dónde Jugarán Los Niños? to ¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? because 'los' in Spanish means 'the' as by convention 'the' must always be lower case. But I cannot do this because ¿Dónde Jugarán los Niños? already exists. I remember moving "Los" to "los" but now because Manafan5]] has moved "los" to the Special Edition article, it has messed things up a bit and it seems that I cannot undo what he has done. How can I set this right so that the special edition will be merge to the main article and the main article will say "los" not "Los"? Thank you. Xangel (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can find out the full information about this at Help:Merging and moving pages, including how to request discussion on a move/merge (if you need it), how to request help carrying out a move/merge, and how to carry out the move or merge yourself. However, in short:
  • Renaming the main article needs the help of an administrator, because the rename would be over a page with history. You can write {{db-move}} on the page to move to, and an administrator will move (rename) the page for you to give the lowercase title.
  • You can carry out the merge without an administrator's help, but it's more difficult to do. Basically, you have to copy the relevant text from the article you're merging from to the article you're merging to, explaining where you're merging from in the edit summary (you must say where you're merging from for copyright reasons). Then you simply redirect the article you merged from to the article you merged into, correcting any double redirects that this creates (check the what-links-here of the article you merged from for redirects you'll have to retarget).
  • If you think the merge needs discussion before you make it, place {{mergefrom}} on the page you plan to merge from, and {{mergeto}} on the page you plan to merge to, to request users to discuss it. If you think the page move requires discussion, you can request it at Wikipedia:Requested moves.
Hope that helps! --ais523 17:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Template

[edit]

I have been looking around wikipedia on Album Articles and I have found a whole mess of things considering the track listings. The mess I am referring to are the disorganized tables that includes immense information such as the producers, writers, length, and featured artists (take Usher's 8701 as an example) and Track Listings that are not in tables but with assorted information the track titles (take Usher's Confessions. Now I have been reading WP:ALBUMS and found the Track Listing table with Before These Crowded Streets having an example Track Listing table. My question then is, if I do come across Album Articles in wikipedia, can I organize the entire Track Listing into the Track Listing table format as in Before These Crowded Streets, even if considering there is limited information (Maximum the Hormone's Buiikikaesu as an example) and for the sake or organizing? Xangel (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting an abusive editor

[edit]

I just looked up Animal liberation and it had been tampered with by an anonymous user it seems (User:Redirect fixer is the user who made the last edit). For issues like this how do I report on a user and what are the consequences for the abuse?

P.S. also check out the history on Animal rights. There are two other users DVD R W and Vangerdahast. -- Xangel (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC) {{helpme}}[reply]

They get blocked immediately after they're found and the stuff is usually fixed; apparently this wasn't, thanks for pointing it out. You can always undo the redirect fixer edit in cases like this. You can report ongoing vandalism to WP:AIV or more complex stuff to WP:ANI, although usually these types are noticed and blocked quickly. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 08:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music of Kingdom Hearts

[edit]

This is a reply to what you left on my talk page. Always remember, guidelines are just that, not a rule. If you think the article needs to break it, then go right on ahead, find a compromise! I personally think that the old tables also looked better, but I realize that the new format I did does have it's appeals, and that "looks better" is not an absolute truth. You have to find the right solution...
I hope we can find something cool for Music of Kingdom Hearts.
For the Music of Kingdom Hearts article, we might have some trouble, because you use actual section titles, whereas the Music of FF pages just simulate them; see the difference between. 

<big>'''Tracklist'''</big>

and 

===Tracklist===

One way to solve this issue is to use the style="margin-top:-2.5em;" to have the table crawl over your title, making it look, like it is a part of it.
You run into problems doing this, with transparency in FireFox, and IE not showing columns without content
One of the solutions to this is to use wikitables. Since MoKH is not like that of MoFF, there are other solutions. Consider using this:

Track listing

[edit]

Notice how it is also a subsection.
I think using this would definitely help the article, while keeping that look you like.
We tried it for FFVII, with a 4-Disc variant, and this was the result :[1]. Check it out.happypal (Talk | contribs) 17:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bond

[edit]

I notice you were changing all references of bond to Bond. This is incorrect, bond should be lowercase. I just thought I'd let you know. i said 08:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it does not say that. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Mixed or non-capitalization says that if it goes by a lowercase or mixed capitalization, then it should be lowercase. i said 08:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. The two guidelines contradict one another. I'll ask about it. i said 09:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Apologize

[edit]

Hello Xangel, I was just reading your talk page (discussion) and I realize what mistake I made. I really didnt pay attention when I first started creating articles. Again, Im sorry!!! Manafan5 (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tracklist template (Pink Floyd's The Wall)

[edit]

You changed The Wall (Pink Floyd album) so it uses the Tracklist template. I posted concerns about it on the article's talk page. Please comment there, and let us know if there was a reason for making this change, and if you know of any way of resolving my concerns while still using the template. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., I also posted a note on the Albums Project talk page to let them know that they are possibly recommending the use of this template without realizing it! I'm not sure if they are even aware of it. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. again, I looked at it some more, and found how to fix the problems I was seeing. I'll let the others know. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is the editor who used the Tracklist:Template for The Wall article. I did it for the sake of organizing it and make it look pretty despite the lack of information it has. So then I'm just asking, are you totally fine with the tracklist right now? Are there any concerns for this? If there is let me know since I just did out of my own will. I've done this for numerous articles already.--Xangel (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for asking, yes, I'm fine with it. I had a wobbly (as they say in Britain) at first, but after I figured out how to change it to the way I wanted, I think it should stay. As I posted on the Wikiproject page, I don't think the musicians project intended to promote this template in their instructions, and they are looking into that issue. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 13:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cardcaptor Sakura Movie 2 The Sealed Card Original Soundtrack.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cardcaptor Sakura Movie 2 The Sealed Card Original Soundtrack.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

[edit]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Duplicate templates, and moved template

[edit]
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

This isn't much of a fuss, but I was checking out Template:Tracklist and I noticed its been moved. Now I see two duplicate templates known as Template:Track listing and Template:Tracklisting. To be frank I don't know why "Tracklist" was moved to "Track listing", but in the history it stated it was moved due to "recent convention". I don't understand what this means and I would like to be pinpoint to this convention, but shouldn't it be moved back to "Tracklist"? It shouldn't have been moved in the first place, because its a template, its supposed to be a tool for editing purposes. Also I would like to redirect "Tracklisting" to "Track listing", or otherwise "Tracklist" which I most prefer. Xangel (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tracklist was redirected back in 2010, with the explanation that we prefer not to use abbreviations in template names, especially when the full text is not much longer. Your point about Template:Tracklisting absolutely correct as that appeared to be an unnecessary duplicate so I have switched it back to a redirect.  7  05:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award

[edit]
For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award.
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

♠TomasBat 00:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Xangel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Xangel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XangelMusic&oldid=1140655425"