User talk:Xanderarena
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drew Charles Arena was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 17:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drew Charles Arena, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Drew Charles Arena
[edit]
Hello Xanderarena. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Drew Charles Arena.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drew Charles Arena}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Time to stop edit warring over that improperly sourced content. See WP:RS--and see WP:EW please. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Edit war?
[edit]Why do you claim that “The Forward”, “Unilad”, and a direct link to the actual post which created the controversy are inappropriate sourcing?
Despite the other user’s efforts to control the narrative, the 4chan post is being investigated by LEOs because numerous victims ensured it was delivered to the OIGs of several Federal resources tasked with criminal justice and civil rights abuses, as well as components of NORTHCOM.
Why are you willing to post all of the additional conspiracy theories, but are unwilling to even let light on the most tangible one available?
WIKI’s task force behavior in this regard reveals your insincerity.
I added content sourced to several legitimate sources. What say you?
Xanderarena (talk) 08:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.