User talk:Xadiiujhy
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Xadiiujhy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Indigenous peoples of the Americas, Indigenous peoples of Siberia, and other pages, did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Introduction to referencing
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to ask what specifically was the problem with what I wrote/why it was removed? Thanks! Xadiiujhy (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- The content in all of these pages is sourced. In your changes that have been reverted, you changed the meaning in the text, sometimes to the reverse of what is sourced, without providing any new sourcing to justify the changes. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 01:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- What did I write that was "to the reverse of what is sourced"? Thanks! Xadiiujhy (talk) 01:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also, did you see the comment I left on your talk page? Xadiiujhy (talk) 01:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- What did I write that was "to the reverse of what is sourced"? Thanks! Xadiiujhy (talk) 01:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- The content in all of these pages is sourced. In your changes that have been reverted, you changed the meaning in the text, sometimes to the reverse of what is sourced, without providing any new sourcing to justify the changes. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 01:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Your comments at Talk:Indigenous peoples of the Americas
[edit]As this is about user conduct now, I'm replying to your comments here. As I already said, the warning was for your similar, unsourced or not-RS sourced, edits across a number of articles, such as this one. Another editor reverted you for the same reason I reverted your similar edits. I notified you about the reasons all the edits were reverted, and made sure you were aware of the policies. I did this in an admin capacity, not as someone who wants to debate content with you, as I tried to make clear. Admins, or any other editor who reverts based on policy like WP:RS, do not have to continue to engage and debate content with you, especially if there is no support for your edits among the editors in good standing who are working on the article. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC)