User talk:X Nilloc X

Welcome!

Hello, X Nilloc X, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Your recent editing history at War in Afghanistan (2001–present) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at War in Afghanistan (2001–present), you may be blocked from editing. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. User:Parsecboy (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to spell this out in no uncertain terms: what you are arguing on the article and related discussion boards is unequivocally wrong. If you continue to edit war, you will be blocked again, for longer and longer durations. Please stop. Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/X Nilloc X for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:X Nilloc X continued disruptive editing. Thank you.--Atlan (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at List of Taliban fatality reports in Afghanistan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Shii (tock) 01:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been blocked for a month, because you have been circumventing this block via IPs. Please stop edit-warring over this issue. If you feel you can abstain from this disruptive behavior and discuss the issue, I or another admin will probably be willing to unblock you early. But if you continue to edit war and evade the blocks on your account, you will certainly make no progress. Parsecboy (talk) 22:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking indef per checkuser - this is just one of a long list of

Confirmed socks - Alison ^❤ 22:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]