User talk:Wyattherb

This is Wyattherb's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: M.A.C.H Modified Air Combat Heroes (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hellknowz was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More in-depth reliable independent sources are needed, such as those at WP:VG/RS. The GameSpot review is good. Looks like Metacritic lists some other reliable sources, so those should get included first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M.A.C.H Modified Air Combat Heroes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:M.A.C.H Modified Air Combat Heroes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wyattherb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M.A.C.H (video game) has been accepted

M.A.C.H (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Strategic lenses—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geoff Keighley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IceWelder [✉] 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KOSMOS 2126 has been accepted

KOSMOS 2126, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Whiteguru (talk) 08:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic lenses

Hello, Wyattherb,

I'm not sure what led you to put a CSD speedy deletion tag INSIDE a proposed deletion PROD tag but it left the page looking like this! Did you not see how messed up this page was after you tagged it? Did you think to revert your edit and try to redo the tagging? Please, if you make an edit that turns out to be a big mistake, undo it and try to figure out how to do it right. Just leaving the page as is creates work for other editors who must spend time trying to understand what went wrong.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, deletion tags or wikicode, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you their opinion and advice. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, thanks for fixing.Wyattherb (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About to delete this article you tagged with a PROD, boy, I was grumpy when I wrote this comment to you! Sorry, I could have said the same thing in a more kind and friendly manner. My apologies for chewing you out for making an honest mistake. 21:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2024

Your edit to User:Wyattherb has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]