User talk:Wwfan

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Justin Achilli, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stoic atarian 10:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism1? How is adding an article about a person vandalism? I would think that DELETING an article and replacing it with a redirect to some other subject would be the act of vandalism.

For the author pages that are being deleted or redirected, I have started adding their contents to the White Wolf page. Apparently White Wolf is noteworthy, but the authors who create material for them are not independently so. Thus, it seems that one potential place to record the information is on the White Wolf article, as it seems to have endured as a noteworthy article.

Your draft article, Draft:Ethan Skemp

Hello, Wwfan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ethan Skemp".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Ethan Skemp

Draft:Ethan Skemp, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ethan Skemp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ethan Skemp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 01:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ethan Skemp

The article Ethan Skemp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]