User talk:Wulf Isebrand

Redundant cats

Hi. Great job in subcategorizing. But when you add subcats please remove the parent cat. For example, having Category:German-American sportspeople in an article makes Category:German Americans redundant. So please removed the latter when you insert the former. More information can be found here. Best, --brew crewer (yada, yada) 14:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with categorization

Hello -- I see that you've done a lot of good work with the ethnic and/or national categorization of people. You've done an excellent job so far, and those of us who work with all of the ethnic or national categories appreciate your work; however, I'd like to point out an error that you and another few editors have repeatedly made in regards to Category:American people by ethnic or national origin. You and these other editors seem to be removing that category from the MAIN categories dealing with, for example, Category:Chinese Americans or Category:German-Americans, and placing the category in the much smaller and less developed SUBCATEGORIES which only contain American people of PARTIAL descent, for example Category:Americans of Chinese descent or Category:Americans of German descent. It's pretty clear that Category:American people by ethnic or national origin should be placed in the MAIN CATEGORY of a given ethnic or nationality category (e.g., in Category:Chinese Americans) and not in the SUBCATEGORY (e.g., Category:Americans of Chinese descent). I'm going to start fixing some of these and hope that you will do the same. Thanks. --Wassermann (talk) 03:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your switch regarding the German-Americans to German Immigrants to the United States is not appropriate in all cases... seems you are abolishing the German-American category? --Teda13 (talk) 03:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(not all planes are jets, but all jets are planes) Being born in the U.S. doesn't exclude someone from their heritage. There are vast Italian-American, Jewish-American, German-American, Greek-American, Irish-American, communities in the U.S. who are second and third generation.. who were born in the U.S. Add the immigrant category if you wish, but moving these persons out of the original category doesn't make them more searchable in Wikipedia. --Teda13 (talk) 16:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cats

Ideas: German immigrants to the US are subdivided into two groups: those who become US citizens and those who do not. However, probably all their descedants are US citizens. Their descendants may be of complete German ancestry or partial German ancestry depending on who has kids with whom. How does one make categories out of all this. Is all this important? Hmains (talk) 01:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's relevant for immigrants to be listed in a subcategory, they grew up in another country, another society, another culture, often spoke a language other than English etc. On the other hand, I don't think it is (in most cases) of any importance to list people because they have for example a great-great-grand-father, who immigrated from Germany or Ireland or Poland etc. I'm unsure about Americans of the second, third, fourth...generation of complete or partial descent. Maybe they identify somehow with it (Charles Bukowski for example identified with his German background), maybe not, usually we don't know, we can list people only by their descent. But I think is of interest for the social groups of German-Americans, Irish-Americans etc. which persons were or are part of it. --Wulf Isebrand (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since we are discussing the catagories for the United States. I'm fairly certain that someone - be they an immigrant or not - who lives in the U.S., and has lived for a long time with first-hand understanding of American culture, should be making the call on the catagories. Not to dismiss the value that someone who lives as a native of and citizen of Ireland, or Italy, or Germany could bring to the discussion ... simply traveling to the U.S. on a trip or for a holiday or to live on a college campus for a while, wouldn't seem to to give enough exposure to understand fully the many issues that should be weighed--Teda13 (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Booians of Fooian descent instead of Fooian(-)Booians

Hello, Wulf Isebrand. I'd like to get your support for a series of renamings I am attempting to see all Category:People by ethnic or national origin changed over to Booians of Fooian descent, a change, based on your vote with the discussion on the subcats for Category:German people by ethnic or national origin, it'd seem you'd favour. The discussion now is here Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 May 21 for Brazilians. Best regards, Mayumashu (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I replied on my page, to keep the talk together and thereby easier to follow. And thanks for the vote support at for Category:Brazilian people by ethnic or national origin Mayumashu (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like your idea with Cat:American people by ethnic/nat. origin

I think however that an article page such as Mexican American should ultimately be incorporated into something like Mexican immigration to the United States, that is on a page that focuses on immigration. And on this page and on Category:Americans of Mexican descent there should be a statement that in colloquial American English, many people consider such a person as 'Mexican American' or 'Mexican-American'. On the subject of Fooian immigration to Booia pages, unlike category pages Category:Booians of Fooian descent, notability, as with any article page, must be shown to exist, in other words it needs to be shown that there has been significant immigrantion to warrant an article. I also think that for a number diaspora, ones that have migrated to a number of countries (such as Armenians) that there should be a single article page on that and not ones for each country the diaspora immigrate to. Therefore, I don t see the goal to be to fill up Category:Ethnic groups in the United States with an article page for every single ethnicity found in the American populous, unlike the case with category pages, which should have a page for every ethnicity found amongst all notable Americans. Mayumashu (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Fernando Torres. Thank you. It would help a lot of editors who don't realise what you're doing when deleting superfluous cats/subcats if you used an edit summary. The same one in every edit would be fine. Ged UK (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Regarding your edit in Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008, there are two competing polls which are the latest ones in Indiana. Obama leads in one poll and McCain leads in the other poll. The margin was larger in the poll McCain is leading in. In the case of polls conducted during the same time period, the margins are combined so McCain is really leading in the combined polls. As your edit only reflected the poll in which Obama is leading, your edit was reverted. Steelbeard1 (talk) 17:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't notize that when I edited the article. --Wulf Isebrand (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catsort

I saw this edit of yours: [1]. You may not be familiar with Template:DEFAULTSORT. It allows editors to set the category sorting once and hav it apply to all the categories. Let me know if you have any questions. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Ville Väisänen. Thank you. Peanut4 (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expatriate footballers categories

Hello. I noticed that you have reverted category changes that I made to many articles. Please visit the talk page for WP:FOOTY and you will see that there is a consensus for the changes I made (as well as a closed CfD). Accordingly, I will be restoring my edits as soon as possible. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support for keeping Fooian expatriate footballers in Booia subcat pages

How s it going? I agree with comments you have made on this issue, that these pages help reduce clutter. long lists and are informative. Unfortunately, some users are against them and they may be soon nominating a bunch for deletion in the coming days - they ve put together this list Category:Xian Expatriate footballers in Y intersections Mayumashu (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Pennsylvania Dutch people

Category:Pennsylvania Dutch people has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German beer culture

The cat is already part of Category:German culture and Category: Beer and breweries in Germany so does not need to also be part of Category:Beer culture. Any articles within Category:German beer culture that are appropriate for Category:Beer culture will be individually placed within that category. Placing Category:German beer culture within Category:Beer culture is therefore inappropriate and redundant. Please see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Overcategorization. Any questions, please ping my talkpage. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 19:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:German Jews who emigrated to the United States to escape Nazism

Category:German Jews who emigrated to the United States to escape Nazism, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Note: I am just informing you, but the nomination was done by User Bulldog123 (talk · contribs) [2] Please discuss with him why he did not inform you of this CfD.) Thank you, IZAK (talk) 12:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American people of Arab descent by occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:American people of Arab descent by occupation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]