User talk:Wtqf

Florence Griffith Joyner

What was the problem with my edit?--Ymblanter (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit are you referring to and why do you think I had a problem with it? I just undid all the edits by people making nonsensical claims, which you had also partially undone. Wtqf (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you, among these edits, undid my entire edit as well. I started a topic at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1972 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watkins Glen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Best known for IP per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Best known for IP. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wtqf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is extraordinary. Edits I have made which hugely improved the quality of articles have triggered someone who describes them as "The usual aggressive copyediting". Just what kind of insanity is it when someone is blocked specifically for improving articles? If you can find any edit I made that clearly degraded the quality of an article, do point it out. Wtqf (talk) 13:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not deny being the Best known for IP, so I am declining the request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wtqf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am obviously simply going to ignore any absurd nickname that you want to accuse me of somehow meriting. I'll say it again: blocking someone specifically for improving articles is insane. You block people from editing if they are harming the encyclopaedia, not if they are consistently and significantly improving it. If you think any edit I have made clearly degraded the quality of an article, do point it out. Wtqf (talk) 15:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious sock of community-banned editor is obvious – and banned. Talk page access revoked like so many times before. Favonian (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.