User talk:Wsx08

Boas vindas!!! Então, agora temos duas contas abertas à vez (ainda não tinhas a QAZ08 bloqueada - merecidamente!!!) e já tinhas esta aberta?!?!?!!?

Já percebi (pela enésima vez; sabes o que quer dizer "enésima"? Duvido muito, muito, MUITO!!!!!), não queres trabalhar bem, queres é foder o trabalho dos outros, tirando as coisas que lá foram postas, quando ninguém tira as tuas, e mais uma vez digo que certas contribuições tuas (INFOBOXES, TEMPLATES dos melhores marcadores e do historial de treinadores das equipas) são interessantes e bem-vindas, agora deixa de colar as frases todas e de tirar as ligações externas ("Fala para aí" estás tu a dizer, "Tiro o que eu quiser")!!!

Muito bem, abre as contas que quiseres, vou fechá-las todas, uma a uma,

Com os melhores cumprimentos, desde Portugal (e WHERE (onde em Inglês) escreve-se assim, não é WERE),

--NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Pararubbas (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Another example of the pattern at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Pararubbas. EdJohnston (talk) 01:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rui Jorge Faria Azevedo

The article Rui Jorge Faria Azevedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 05:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]