User talk:Wrssrir

Thanks for experimenting with the page Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Regional Transportation District, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Regional Transportation District was changed by Wrssrir (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-17T04:49:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Cashier freak (talk) 22:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CrispMuncher (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Southwest Airlines. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Northwest Airlines. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Northwest Airlines, you will be blocked from editing.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Jet2.com destinations. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

13:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nordstar airlines

A tag has been placed on Nordstar airlines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of StarJets

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article StarJets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A Stub-class article that doesn't seem to be notable. Only reference is a forum, which is not a reliable source.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

13:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of StarJets

I have nominated StarJets, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarJets. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

18:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for merging and redirecting StarJets to GeminiJets! Good job,

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

19:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]