User talk:Writhedhornbill

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Blackbrook Zoological Park. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.blackbrookzoologicalpark.co.uk/about_us.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Blackbrook Zoological Park with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Blackbrook Zoological Park with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Blackbrook Zoological Park/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Blackbrook Zoological Park saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Your original contributions are welcome. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackbrook Zoological Park

The article Blackbrook Zoological Park has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- ReyBrujo 20:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chestnut-backed Thrush

A tag has been placed on Chestnut-backed Thrush, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FeralDruid 08:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to lack of context, this article includes peacock words (beautiful) and personal opinion (thankfully). -FeralDruid 08:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, admins Tone and the wub have stubbed and edited the article, removing the peacock terms and personal opinion. It's also been added to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds. -FeralDruid 09:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Zoo

Hello Mr Hornbill you seem to know a lot about Chester Zoo. Therefore could you please answer the following questions for me to help improve the article. I Also take it that you are Writhedhornbill from the zoo beat forums.

1. Are the Lion Tailed Macaques still off-display

2. How many Rhinos do the zoo have.

3. Have the Addax arrived yet, if not when are they due

4. What are the plans conserining the two female Bengal Tigers

5. How many youngsters have the Geoffreys mamrmosets produced

6. Could you tell us something about the zoos plans conserning 2020 and the SuperZoo.

Ae12079410 22:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know About the lion tailed macaques, but I presume that they are on show.

The zoo has 7 rhinos (with a female from Dvur Kralorve on the way, and Manyara is Pregnant!)

The addax are not coming to Chester. The plans were scrapped, and now there will be cheetah!

The Bengal tigers will leave the zoo when the zoo has a female sumatran.

The Geoffroy's marmosets have had lots and Lots of Young! Don't know the amounts, about 15, I think:D

The zoo will be split into four zones. Grassland (Rhino, Gelada, Barbary lions etc.), African safari (Hippo, Giraffe, Rhino etc.), Islands and Water (Islands in Danger, new aquarium, and lots of island species, monkeys and The zoo's tapir!)

Lesser Antillean Iguana‎

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lesser Antillean Iguana‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mike Searson (talk) 14:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jonathan Beilby

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jonathan Beilby, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jonathan Beilby seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jonathan Beilby, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Writhedhornbill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Seraphim♥Whipp 17:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Andrew claydon

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Andrew claydon. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Beilby

==AfD nomination of Jonathan Beilby==

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jonathan Beilby, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Beilby. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Click23 (talk) 01:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]