User talk:Writertoo

Ocean Beach

Jeepers, it's been a rough first couple of Wiki weeks for you, hasn't it, what with the POV brigade laying seige to your article ;) I really, really appreciate the factial, neutral and encyclopedic content you're contributing. Rock on with your bad self! :D Still, though, there are a couple of things you'll want to observe before you get too far in.

One of them is WP:Cite for what good sources are and how to cite them in your article. Like those pesky research papers from school (long, long ago for me, but not so long that I've forgotten the pain) every fact you put down has to come from a reliable source--luckily, here it can be as simple as a web-link to an online reference (carefully consider your online sources, though... myspaces pages and youtube are not so good. Common sense stuff, you know).

There's soooooo mucn information here it can be hard to sift through sometimes, so if you're having trouble figuring out exactly HOW you're supposed to implement your sourcing, just give me a yell or hit up the Help desk. Oooh, and also? The cheatsheet is your friend. Er... or it's mine at least ;)

Best Regards,

Wysdom 05:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my article. I saw that the page was up and added info with sourcing and removed unattributal opinion. I began a couple of days ago. -- Writertoo 23:09, 16 April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ocean Beach, San Diego, California. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Ocean Beach, San Diego. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Edits to Ocean Beach

Hi, and thanks for your concern over the edits to Ocean Beach. No, I'm not the original writer of the statements in question or any content in the article. I rarely have time to do the requisite research for writing the kind of well-sourced material Wikipedia should be home to.

I reverted the changes made by IP address 207.200.122.11 because they were done incorrectly. Wikipedia articles are often a work in progress and information should never be outright deleted from an article unless it is libelous, abusive, nonsense, etc. Information that is contested should be tagged with {{fact}}, which indicates a citation is needed, and a note left on the talk page of the article explaining that a source--or better source--is needed. Please refer to WP:CITE for more information about when and how to tag unsourced material.

In the future, please assume good faith of others, and check on the User talk page of the editor who was reverted for comments before jumping to the conclusion that someone is knowingly and willfully reverting to preserve their own POV. Had you gone to the talk page of the editor whose deletions I reverted, you would have seen the comment I left, and I believe that would have explained things.

Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any other concerns.

Best wishes,

Wysdom 05:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done.

I just wanted to thank you for your hurricane effort to clean up the Ocean Beach page. That page needed some serious help but I never had the time to really get involved in it; not to mention there are a couple of anon editors that constantly vandalize it with their own POV. Good job. Ryanpm4545 17:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Missionbeach1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missionbeach1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Binionmug.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Binionmug.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Binionmug.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Binionmug.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:BinionMugShots.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BinionMugShots.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Anthony Spilotro (a.o)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Anthony Spilotro do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I have reverted your edits to add the link to the page of the writer, it has an internal link which is sufficient. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missionbeach1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missionbeach1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oceanbeachsign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]