User talk:Writersword

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Darwen do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MegaSloth (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Darwen. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. MegaSloth (talk) 12:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. something lame from CBW 12:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Darwen. Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 12:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Darwen, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Repeated addition of spam link to local news site as only contributions suggests an affiliation with the site MegaSloth (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple accounts

From the history of Darwin, it looks like you may have used this account and the IP 86.133.226.63 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS) to repeatedly add spam to the article. The order of edits combined with this account's creation date and the history of warnings on this and the IP's talk pages could be interpreted as indicating this was done to deliberately evade scrutiny and/or a block, a practice known as sockpuppeteering on Wikipedia and expressly prohibited. On this occasion, I am prepared to assume ignorance on your part. Please refrain from this practice in the future, or you may face a ban. Thank you. --MegaSloth (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Writersword. You have new messages at MegaSloth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.