User talk:Writer Holder

Welcome!

Hello, Writer Holder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Vellore Institute of Technology. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 19:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Shanze1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tamil Nadu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shanze1 (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kongu Nadu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Begoon 08:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kongu Nadu, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Begoon 08:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tiruppur, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. See MOS:NOTSEEALSO. David Biddulph (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kongu Nadu

Please see WP:SEEALSO - pages already linked in the article should not be linked in that section again - I just reverted a whole bunch of your unnecessary, gratuitous insertions (and please stop spamming "Kongu Nadu" everywhere you think you can - you don't seem to be here to do much else). Read WP:SPA and WP:RGW. Thank you. -- Begoon 02:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kongu Nadu. Begoon 12:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kongu Nadu Edit Page

Hello Begoon!! Let us clarify who is vandalising the Wikipedia with ugly and bad heart. Can you explain what is wrong in adding the Educational Institutions, Sports, Tourism and related things in the Kongu Nadu page??. Even if you go and check the aspirant states pages like Vidarbha, Such things are available. You have the freedom to be an Anti Kongu Nadu, but you don't have a rights to remove good things like the educational institutions, sports, tourism, temples etc available in Kongu Nadu region. Don't think that, you are a BOSS of Wikipedia. I appreciate that, You have been in Wikipedia editing for more than 10 years but that doesn't mean that, You can remove even the good things like educational institutions, tourism, temples, sports things available in the Kongu Nadu region. Above things can make people easier to read and increase the economy of the region with education and tourism. Analyse and revert back with positive comments??. Again I am telling you that, You and some Co who is vandalising the Kongu Nadu page by removing the content have the freedom to be an Anti Kongu Nadu but you don't have any power to stop me in being an another KCR (K. Chandrashekar Rao|Telangana CM) of Kongu Nadu (a part of ancient Chera Dynasty and modern day Tamil speaking Chera Nadu as well). Thank You!! Writer Holder (talk) 02:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've already explained the problem in my edit summaries: If there is something notable to say about any of these items, supported by reliable sources, then add some referenced prose - otherwise this is utterly unencyclopedic - WP:INDISCRIMINATE. We are an encyclopedia, not a gazeteer or a listings magazine - indiscriminate listings like this are inappropriate. Do not restore it in that format.

Additionally, read WP:NPA. The fact that you are a single-purpose account dedicated to spamming "Kongu-Nadu" wherever you think you can does not make people who revert your edits "anti Kongu-Nadu". As is often the case with editors dedicated to pushing a "cause" you see everything in that light, while the rest of us take a wider view and care much less about your "cause" than we do about your pushy, damaging edits. This is not the place to fight your campaign - we are very used to editors who mistakenly think it is, and if they disrupt the encyclopedia they are prevented from continuing. Quite honestly I couldn't give a damn about your battle to right great wrongs - but I do give a damn about the encyclopedia and will protect it from low quality content and non-encyclopedic agenda-driven editing. You would do well to read the links I have given, and alter your approach if you want to keep editing here. Thanks for the note. -- Begoon 02:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Begoon!! Let me clarify it in a genuine way. I am not an expert in Wikipedia editing. Though I have started editing the pages in recent days, my quality or technics of editing is not up to the mark. Though you have been in this wiki editing for more than 10 years, why don't you add even more colours to such page without removing the content like Education, Tourism, Temples, Sports etc??. A good 10 years experienced Wikipedia Editor will keep the content and make it even more colorful to the page if the technics and quality of editing is not up to the mark. Removing the contents like Education, Sports, Tourism, Temples etc clearly shows that, Some Anti Kongu Nadu people are vandalising the page!! If you're are a 10 years experienced Wikipedia Editor, You can add Education, Tourism, Temples, Sports and other things available in Kongu Nadu region with such quality and high technics. Thanks!!! Writer Holder (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop fragmenting the conversation and keep it here, in one place, please.

No, I'm not going to do your editing for you. I've explained how you can add content that will be acceptable and encyclopedic. If you don't want to, or can't do that then you'll need to wait until somebody can and does. Unencyclopedic content will not be left in place in the meantime though.

There are no shortcuts to building encyclopedic content - it's hard work - if you're not prepared to do it then you might need to ask yourself if wikipedia is the right place for you, or if you might be better off starting a website or blog of your own, where you can offer whatever content and opinions you wish about your pet "cause" to your heart's content. Or you might find discussion forums aligned with your agenda where you can discuss your ideas freely. At wikipedia, though, content you add needs to comply with all of our policies - particularly reliable sourcing, neutrality, style, relevance and compliance with the goals of the encyclopedia, or it is subject to removal. I hope that makes things clearer, and I really don't think there's much more I can add to what I've now explained in detail, and at length. -- Begoon 03:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kongu Nadu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019 - again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kongu Vellalar. - Arjayay (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Annamalai Kuppusamy

The article Annamalai Kuppusamy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 03:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kongu Nadu, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 13:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kongu Vellalar. - SUN EYE 1 09:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 09:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 09:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]