User talk:WriterWritesWriting

Welcome!

Hello, WriterWritesWriting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rua Red

Please clean up the article RUA RED to be a little more encyclopedic. In its present state, the article you have created creates more questions than it answers. For example, what does the name mean, why is it all in capital letters, what will be exhibited there, and so on. Be informative, but spare the details that noone will ever care about (e.g. nobody cares who opens the place). And drop the superlatives, like "exciting". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a PR platform. As an example, you could perhaps pick another museum, and use that as a template? Just a tip. -- Fullstop (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RUA RED

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article RUA RED, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Appears be some unreferenced advertising, previously speedily-deleted. Also, it does not conform to Wikipedia's article naming convention.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scjessey (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of RUA RED

I have nominated RUA RED, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUA RED. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scjessey (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rua Red is now in your Sandbox

Hi there. I've moved the article to User:WriterWritesWriting/Sandbox, were you can work on it in peace until its ready. The page can be moved back into main space when its in shape, ok? I'll be here to help you along with it, just give me a nudge (like you did a little earlier) if you need my input on anything. I'll do some basic re-formatting and cleanup to get you started. -- Fullstop (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Westbrook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Westbrook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Westbrook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • DP • ^{huh?} 03:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]