User talk:Wriekhathaar

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Wriekhathaar! Thank you for your contributions. I am AaronY and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! AaronY (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wriekhathaar, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Wriekhathaar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Acacia mucronata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victoria

Acacia riceana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Petiole

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Acacia riceana

On 23 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Acacia riceana, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the wattle Acacia riceana, native to Tasmania, was named after the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time of its discovery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Acacia riceana. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cenarrhenes

On 25 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cenarrhenes, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the leaves of the Port Arthur plum smell like stale cabbage when crushed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cenarrhenes. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Agastachys

On 28 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agastachys, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agastachys. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Persoonia gunnii

On 28 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Persoonia gunnii, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Persoonia muelleri

On 28 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Persoonia muelleri, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parent and child categories

Hi - where 'Buildings and structures of Tassie' exists - Buildings and structures in lonnie aka Launceston - is a child cat - in general the mix of parent and child cats is discouraged... just explaining this if you see me reverting the addition of the two together. cheers

If you look at what cats are parent cats at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Launceston,_Tasmania - there is no need to have items from lonnie in both - I do hope that makes sense... well worth looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization_FAQ sats 13:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read your talk page edits? Your adding parent cats to articles with child cats is continuing... do you need further explanation of what you are doing? sats 10:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, wasting a bit of our time, otherwise OK. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. sats 10:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your earlier edit history shows that you have clearly had good experience editing botanical articles, but you show no sign of responding to talk page items, and continue to put in the parent category despite reversions by experienced editors - (expect to be blocked if you continue to do so without any indication of why you insist on reverting without edit summaries)

It would be good if you could continue to edit article relevant to Launceston without reverting corrections, as the Tasmania project has very few active editors. Try not to be so shy, and respond - and you are less likely to be blocked if you actually engage - rather than being silent in your editing. Using talk pages shows a sign that you are willing to be a part of the community. Remaining silent and reverting corrections is likely to be interpreted as an unwillingness to understand a basic wikipedia process of not combining child and parent categories - it is a very small simple part of the larger scheme of things - and not something you should keep reverting! sats 15:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holyman House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holyman House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holyman House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]