User talk:Wrestling Angel

Hello

Please calm down. Regards ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

• Assume other editors are here to help as much as is possible.
• Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. At the top of the edit page, it says "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone," which means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.
• It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself (or something you're connected to) to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself (or something you're connected to). -- Because you knew Tom Zenk, you have a conflict of interest.
• Vandalism is defined as a deliberate attempt to mess up the site. It does not include real accidents (although competence is required), nor does it include someone trying to improve the encyclopedia in a way you disagree with.
• "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
• Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Ian.thomson (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Wrestling Angel, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wrestling Angel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

How to write articles that do not get deleted

If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything, here are the steps you should follow:

1) Choose a topic whose notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.

2) Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find.

3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.

4) Summarize those sources from step 2, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer.

5) Combine overlapping summaries (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports) where possible, repeating citations as needed.

6) Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism.

7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.

8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 2 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Signature

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (such as the Help Desk) (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your missing my point

I edited Tom’s page and that was the ONLY reason I even signed up. I watched for two days before I edited it and IncrediblyHulk had gone on multiple times to edit Tom’s page because it kept saying “last Edited...” only a few hours earlier...multiple times by this guy. He seems to take down anything anyone changes...not just me or Tom’s family. I am not adding any page and I gave links to many things that verifies everything i changed earlier today on the help forum, I have nothing more to say and hope someone takes those links and properly edits Tom’s page with the FACTS. If anyone would bother to look at the references listed under Tom’s page it includes articles that are NOT in your version of credible. Articles speculating why Tom got sick, and nothing beyond Tabloid Rumors. Yet I’m getting stuff like this about your rules, well enforce your own rules against your volunteers. Yes I am upset, but if you loved someone and knew them for 25 years and they died and you see the web site that many refer to for reference acting like your loved one wasn’t a human being and posting false criminal activity, then when you try to change it get trashed and ignored....well wouldn’t you be upset? I don’t think this is what Jimmy Wales planned when he started Wikipedia. Wrestling Angel (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)