User talk:Woywodt

Hey.

Your draft on Postel really isn't ready yet. One source isn't enough. What else do you have? DS (talk) 02:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boje Postel (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 05:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Woywodt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Boje Postel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boje Postel. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boje Postel (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Plausably notable but we need sources that support the information here and show that the subject is notable. I've replaced a rejection with this decline so that more work can be put into the page

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boje Postel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boje Postel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 19:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WoywodtSince you don't have a user page I don't know if you will see this and other comments. I am a relatively new editor and have been through the mill moving an article from draft to mainspace. I have looked at your article and am not impressed. You don't have any references from reliable sources (or any references at all) what you have is a very short biography of someone who painted mostly landscapes and the world is full of those. (I am reminded of another landscape painter who fought in WWWI, this one was born in Austria). You need some mention of him in some respectable source, a book, a magazine, review by art critics. You are fortunate in that the editors who have declined your article actually gave you sensible and understandable reasons, and even pointed you towards sources within wikipedia that can help you. A big improvement over the way I was treated once, when I was told simply that my submission was contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia, with out the courtesy of an explanation as to how or why. You even have one comment that your subject is possibly notable, and that is a step up, now for you to prove it. Lots of LuckOldperson (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boje Postel has been accepted

Boje Postel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]