User talk:Wovokanarchy

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons as you did to Ward Churchill and Tom Flanagan (political scientist). Continuing to present individuals as racist or other such things without absolutely sterling-quality references can and will get you blocked. ♠P M C♠ 19:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ward Churchill

Please stop edit-warring on the Ward Chrchill article.

If you want to make as controversial a change as you keep inserting, start a discussion on the Talk page for the article first. Otherwise, I suspect, you will continue to be deleted and, eventually, further, more restrictive action will be called for. David in DC (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, seriously, quit it. If you're going to call people racist, you need some bloody reliable sources that back you up. You've done this before and I've warned you; keep it up and I block. ♠P M C♠ 20:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tom Flanagan (political scientist). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Saalstin (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Flanagan (political scientist), you will be blocked from editing. Saalstin (talk) 02:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Tom Flanagan (political scientist). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Saalstin (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I thought I should drop you a note, just in case you weren't understanding the warnings you've been receiving. In the edits you've been making to Tom Flanagan (political scientist), you've been calling him a "racist", which is a very strong accusation, and our policies on biographies apply. Please don't reinsert the claim unless you have it verifiably backed up by a reliable source. Thanks --Saalstin (talk) 02:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tom Flanagan (political scientist), you will be blocked from editing. Saalstin (talk) 21:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tom Flanagan (political scientist), you will be blocked from editing. Saalstin (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]