Yeah, um. Tell me why a changing schedule matters? No seriously. Tell what it actually affects. What is the significance of a schedule changing because of a seizure-inducing incident. All you seem to assert is "oh the schedule changed after the seizures :B" Do people have seizures on Tuesdays more than Thursdays? Give me a reason you can actually adequately explain. And sign your posts.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 02:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All you say is that the schedule changed. Could you please tell me why that matters? The point is, what does that have to do with anything? Besides "Pikachu's Goodbye" which was completely new, we don't have proof that anything changed between what they planned to air before the Pokémon Shock. And schedules aren't "infected". They're affected. A bad episode is not a disease that spreads and forces the program schedule to change. Believe me the four-month hiatus was certainly notable, but that's already mentioned in another section. And you still didn't sign your post I don't know why people find that so difficult but learn to do it.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 00:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and for now I won't revert you. I reverted you again because it was evident that you definitely received my message but didn't act. So yeah, I'll start waiting again. But could you give me something that sounds solid?—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 00:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sign your posts. And you misunderstood me or something. What I said was were there any changes besides a timeslot? I.e. was the airing order originally meant to be different or something? And seriously. Even Bulbapedia calls it trivia. Look, here's what I'll do. I'll say it was aired on Tuesdays after the hiatus, but a list of episodes is by no means notable to that article.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you think the episode list is important? It shows how thw hiatus changed the original schedule (Before and After)—ピカ•ピカ•ピカチュウ
I don't think it's important because all that changed are dates and the day of the week. From what everyone can tell, it's still airing in the exact same order it would have been before the incident.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 17:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But they didn't air in the exact same order if you remember the Holiday Hi-Jynx and Snow why Out aired after Ash got its final badge and those two were a 1 hour special.—ピカ•ピカ•ピカチュウ
Please cease incorporating large numbers of non free images into pages. Your recent additions are nothing but gratutitous decoration and have no bearing on the actual article. This is in direct contravention of policy. It is my understanding that you may be blocked from editing if you persist in your behaviour. Algie The Pig20:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I do not need consensus to remove these decorative images. The fair use image policy provides the necessary rationale for my recent edits. Algie The Pig20:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S - If you revert me again today, you will be blocked for breaching our 3 revert rule. I wouldn't wish you to be blocked over the continual reinstatement of decorative images. Jolly unfair, I would say. Algie The Pig20:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, sorry, reading a policy and chanting "Critical commentary" isn't sufficent. Please show me where in the article you refer to the images and comment on them. Thanks in advance. Algie The Pig21:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed this report. Please continue to discuss this at the article talkpage. Alternatively, you may try reporting the other at WP:3RR but I should warn you that both of you may end up blocked. I have left this same message at the others talkpage. LessHeard vanU21:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's a misunderstanding the term "critical commentary". WP:FU states that nonfree images in "lists, galleries, discographies" is normally unacceptable. There was discussion of this issue at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Removal of images from lists of episodes and I think consensus shows that they do not qualify under fair use. You can also look at the featured list movies and you'll see there is no nonfree images. Don't take it personally or anything, it's a common misunderstanding. If you have any questions, feel free to ask :) Spellcast22:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Worldatlas1989, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Spellcast22:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pikachuthemovie2001.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot06:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As I have pointed out, please view the discussions on the project talk page. Jynx's information is part of a Pokémon#Racism, so there is no need for the article. TTN14:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Worldatlas. I'm sure you are aware by now that inserting nonfree images in galleries goes against the fair use policy. If you got permission from an admin, can you please say who it is? If an admin really did give permission, he/she is clearly mistaken. Spellcast16:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The next time you create a page in userspace contravening the use of fair use images, or a duplicate article like Pokemon Movies in an attempt to get round fair use policy, you will be blocked. You have been informed about correct policy enough times now. ELIMINATORJR16:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated violation of Fair Use image policy, despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
I'm no admin so I can't delete them; nominating them for deletion because of that dude's socks isn't a sufficient reason to do so. Plus even if we did I'm pretty sure he'd just resort to uploading them endlessly. -WarthogDemon23:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
What the hell! What did i do? Unblock me! This is rude. I am a faithful contributer! Know i'm really going to sue Wikipedia. This has gone off long enough. If i don't get unblocked today i'm going to sue Wikipedia for going against my human rights, being unfair when i have not done anything wrong, being direspectful, and ignoring me when i need help or ignoring my questions i ask, claiming that my IP is a proxy when its not, protecting my talk page when cleary i don't understand why i'm blocked, claiming that i'm a sock puppet of a banned user that i never heard of. My IP is 97.99.126.217
Decline reason:
As per WP:NLT, you are not permitted to edit until you unconditionally withdraw your legal threat or until your legal actions are resolved. — Yamla20:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
What the hell! What did i do? Unblock me! This is rude. I am a faithful contributer! Know i'm really going to sue Wikipedia. This has gone off long enough. If i don't get unblocked today i'm going to sue Wikipedia for going against my human rights, being unfair when i have not done anything wrong, being direspectful, and ignoring me when i need help or ignoring my questions i ask, claiming that my IP is a proxy when its not, protecting my talk page when cleary i don't understand why i'm blocked, claiming that i'm a sock puppet of a banned user that i never heard of. My IP is 97.99.126.217
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user has been sending out abusive email. She has refused to stop after being warned repeatedly. User is now blocked with email privs disabled. --Yamla21:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Introduction
How to edit a page
Help
Tips
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
Thanks for uploading Image:Pikachuthemovie2001.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
