User talk:World Carnivore Tribe

December 2022

Hello, I'm Izzy Moony. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Red meat seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Izzy Moony_{Hi new friend!} 11:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Red meat. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Izzy Moony_{Hi new friend!} 11:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Saturated fat, you may be blocked from editing. Izzy Moony_{Hi new friend!} 11:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

World Carnivore Tribe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is a vegan bias on the red meat and saturated fat articles, not just these but many others related to these topics. The editors that have been guarding these for years Alexbrn Bon Courage, Psychologist Guy, Zefr, CarlfromVienna, Throughthemind and Trimton are vegans or are supportive of that diet. There is a vegan COI here. World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 15:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bon courage:, @Psychologist Guy:, @Zefr:, @CarlFromVienna:, @Throughthemind: and @Trimton:, @C.J. Griffin: please declare your vegan bias and stop attacking carnivore or keto users World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

World Carnivore Tribe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was incorrectly blocked as a sockpuppet by Psychologist Guy and Zefr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JustANameInUse who are known to gaslight. I am not BecomeFree or Zalgo, no proof was presented. My original account should be unblocked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1066#JustANameInUse_back_on_IPs_attacking_users_as_being_paid_%22vegan_activists%22 Yamla is not a neutral editor he works with Psychologist Guy a vegan activist as seen on the above linkWorld Carnivore Tribe (talk) 13:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You must return to your original account to request unblock. If you further disrupt this page with wild accusations with no foundation, I will remove access. 331dot (talk) 15:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Saturated fat

Both your post on the saturated fat talk page about vegan bias and my comment confirming and elaborating on your post were deleted.sbelknap (talk) 13:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbelknap: the saturated fat, red meat and carnivore diet entry on the monotrophic diet have been monitored by vegans for about 3 years... like others I have been watching.

If you check the monothropic diet article at least 6 independent editors have complained about vegan bias and abuse on the talk-page but all those editors are quickly blocked or given warnings on their talk-page by Bon Courage or Zeft...

There was one sock-puppet on that article but now every editor is being accused of one who turns up on the talk-page or article. You should check the archive [1] [2]. Bon Courage (who used to be Alexbrn it seems), Zefr or Psychologist Guy are in good standing with admins and often message or sends emails to admins to block Keto users. These vegan users have had two people I know blocked from this website. If a new user supportive of keto or carnivore diet turns up to balance an article they are reported as an impersonation, vandal, sock or joke account and are blocked by admins. CarlFromVienna uploades vegan dishes to WikiCommons... (!) he is active on the German Wikipedia to promote vegan diets, he's lying on his talk-page about his beliefs. In total you are up against about 5 vegans or users sympathetic to that diet. It impossible to have more balance with help.

I recommend reaching out to Travis Statham who can report on this abuse, he's also got a database at Meatrition.com which documents vegan bias. World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 14:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is incredible. I've found extensive deletions/reversions/obfuscation of content on dozens of Wikipedia pages that are related in some way to plant-based or animal-based foods. Also many attacks on editors who attempt to correct the vegan bias. sbelknap (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbelknap: Same thing happened on Atkins diet talk-page and Animal source foods, accounts are threatened, blocked as socks or criticized for trolling without evidence and talk-pages are quickly archived....

It's always the same users Alexbrn/Bon Courage, Psychologist Guy, Zefr, CarlfromVienna, Throughtthemind or Trimton. 4 of these users are active members of the vegan Wikiproject [3]. Bon Courage will often archive talk-page comments or delete them very quickly as trolling or vandalism but this is just an excuse to remove comments... All these users work along side each other. Practically every nutrition article related to animal foods has been edited by the above users.

You might be interested in [4], by [5] which lead nowhere because the user was abused by the above editors. Many others have tried and failed, conversations are archived and users leave the website due to abuse from vegans or are banned. Nina Teicholz, Travis Statham or Shawn Baker off-site needs to document all of this systematic abuse. It has been going on for years... World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making a off-line bibliography of wikipedia articles on nutrition and health that appear to have been corrupted by those with an ideological or religious POV. If you have a list, please do share. sbelknap (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to help you guys with refining your strategy a little. Wikipedia is only a summary of the scientific consensus. After all that‘s what an encyclopedia is all about. So if you find articles that tell you to „Eat your veggies“ it’s not a vegan conspiracy but only a reflection of what medical textbooks and nutritional societies are saying. When you want to add anything beyond that, you must change the textbooks and the societies' recommendations first. Nutritional science is one of the most boring sciences out there. It only moves at glacial pace: eating more veggies and cutting saturated fat has been recommended since the 1980s now. You‘re not gonna change that over night. And there is no shortcut to changing it by editwarring on Wikipedia. All these changes will be deleted so that the articles here reflect the official recommendations that have been in place for 40 years now. CarlFromVienna (talk) 07:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You and Psychologist Guy have admitted to being in contact with known vegan activists John A. McDougall . Sorry but you have been busted. You are promoting vegan ideology on this website. Psychologist Guy is an associate of vegan quack Michael Greger you have been exposed World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 13:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What we have here is a WP:LTA who loves amping up Wikipedia drama in the nutrition space, and who knows exactly how to yank editors' chains to do that. sbelknap is this latest target of that, and his chain is most certainly yanked. Bon courage (talk) 08:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your hallucination is noted. I'm not feeling anything like that. Perhaps if we focus on wikipedia content, we will make more progress. If anybody has examples of wikipedia articles about nutrition and health that appear to be have been corrupted by an ideological or religious POV, please do share. sbelknap (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not LTA

I am not an LTA. Bon Courage changed his username from Alexbrn to confuse users https://srid.ca/wikipedia-sleuth but this user is well known for his harassment of other editors. I have had only one other account on this website and I was incorrectly blocked as a sock-puppet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JustANameInUse, Psychologist Guy and Zefr had me blocked under a Zalgo sock--puppet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BecomeFree... but I was not BecomeFree and no investigation was filed, I was just blocked. I have had only 1 account which was not BecomeFree or LizardMeat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LizardMeat#Other_accounts?, I tried to defend myself on an IP but you ended up having that blocked... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/93.141.96.10. The history of the carnivore diet and talk-page has many accounts but you and these other vegan editors have all the accounts blocked as one user as a vandal or LTA. I am definately a victim here because I created one account and was incorrectly blocked as being someone else... this was done deliberately to silence me like is being done to others who are carnivore or keto.

Other editors have been blocked or gaslighted for no valid reason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tempes1, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DietCokeFeast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FrederickZoltair. The behavior has being going on for 4 years now... revert all edits by a user trying to improve carnivore diet or saturated fat article, accuse the user of having a carnivore or keto POV, gang up on them on the talk-page... if that fails have them blocked as an LTA, vandal or sock. Harassment from vegan activists has become the norm on this website. World Carnivore Tribe (talk) 13:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]