User talk:WorldWideWaffle1

Welcome!

Hello, WorldWideWaffle1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 20:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pathfinder userbox

Thanks for using my Pathfinder userbox. - Tim D. Williamson ^yak-yak 01:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WorldWideWaffle1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licht en Liefde - moved to Draft:Licht en Liefde

Hi WorldWideWaffle1, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Licht en Liefde has been moved to Draft:Licht en Liefde. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

reliable source - see WP:RS
primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
verification - see WP:V
notability - see WP:N
webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My apologies, it's been a while since I made English-language translations on Wikipedia. I tend to forget the English community has different habits than the Dutch one (where adding extra sources to a translated article seems to be frowned upon - I've had people delete my sources in favour of the Dutch "Go check the original article for sources" template there before on translated articles). I've added extra secondary and tertiary sources, though most are Dutch. I'm having trouble with finding non-primary sources for the "Inclusion and networking (after 2000)" part (the original article uses a primary source for this paragraph). Would it be best to keep it as it is right now, or to delete it until a suitable source turns up? WorldWideWaffle1 (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WorldWideWaffle, Greetings to you and that you for the message above. First of all, if you need to send message to an editor in "Your Talk Page" then you need to "ping" the editor. You could input {{ping}} before you write you message, such as if you need to talk to me on your talk page, it will look like this {{ping|CASSIOPIEA}}. I know you sent me the message because your talk page is on my watchlist since I sent the above message to you. Secondly your input (format) of reference/source is incorrect. For web link source pls go to WP:CITEWEB and its template- see here Template: cite web. You could download VisualEditor - see here Wikipedia:VisualEditor and it just requests only one click (input of the url) and everything else will be automatically filled for you.

It is ok to use source in Dutch or any other languages. We the reviewer will look at the text in translation and if in doubt we will seek the Dutch Wiki site for help. By the way, the photo file need to be under free use content (photo found in WikiCommon) and if not it need to be removed for not violating the copy right infringement. When all is done, then move it to article space and pls ping me for me review the page to make it into name space. Thank you for your contribution and have a good night. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Thank you for your advice. The changes have been made to the draft. The content of the draft has been moved to the article space. Feel free to let me know if I overlooked anything. WorldWideWaffle1 (talk) 11:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WorldWideWaffle, I have not reviewed yet as I cant. I dont know what you do the draft copy - see here Draft:Licht en Liefde is still in its place and the name space article somehow the creator change to my name for such I cant reviewed it. You deleted the {{db-r2}}. Pls revert it back to as before and wait for a day or two and while working on your draft and moved the "draft" copy to article. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: I'm not sure of what you need me to do. Could you clarify your instructions? I assumed "moving the article to article space" meant moving the code to the actual article? In the meantime, other users have made useful changes to the article. I've added those new bits of code to your draft. Is that of use to you? WorldWideWaffle1 (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you go to the article page Licht en Liefde you would see the creator is me instead of you (on the top - small text in blue), because you deleted {{db-r2}} - see here on the history different page - [1] on the left panel. You have to revert the revision to mine by clicking "restore to this version" (left panel) on the history different page - see here [2]. Wait until this page is deleted which will take about 1-2 days.

Do what you needed on the "draft" copy Draft:Licht en Liefde and moved back to article page 2 days from now. You could do this by clicking the menu > page> move> select article and stated citations and source provided. Do it in 2 days from now. Let me know if you need further help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Thank you for your explanations. I've reverted the page to your version. There was no "restore to this version" option (no small, blue text on the top of the article page showing the creator's name either - only the editor of the selected revision, once a revision was selected), so I hope I've done it the right way.

Hi, I think it is good now. However, I cant review it as the source are from books in dutch and I do not have resources to find source online. Other reviewers will come by to review in the future. The backlog is long, so it might take a little while. Thank you and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WorldWideWaffle1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]