User talk:Workhardalltime

Workhardalltime, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Workhardalltime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you paid

You have appeared as a new editor, editing only an article that has been worked on by paid editors. Are you being paid to edit this article? David notMD (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then, do you have any personal connection to Sandeep Kumar Mishra that caused this to be the very first and only article you have chosen to edit? Any history of editing under a different account? For a new editor, you demonstrate unexpected sophistication for how to edit articles and a seemingly coincidental choice of editing a draft that has been declined three times rather than a more typical new-editor focus on improving existing articles. David notMD (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Every experienced editor thinks every new editor is paid. Dear, No. I want to create this page because I am a book lover and I liked his poetry book. So as a fan,I think he should have a wiki article. Thanks.--Workhardalltime (talk) 08:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Workhardalltime: this does not explain where the images you uploaded to Commons come from. This image, for example, has all the camera metadata available and does not appear to be available on the Internet. And you have marked it "own work". Where did you get the images? --- Possibly (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please reply here and not on my talk page, to keep the discussion together.--- Possibly (talk) 10:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These photos are available on the writer's website-(https://www.sandeepkumarmishra.com/events) anyone can have access. Thanks.

As I said as a fan of the writer,I wanted to create a page and I am new here and idea to create a page for the writer brought me on wikipedia. Thus I STARTED HERE ON WIKIPEDIA. If you can suggest which paragraphs to remove or rewrite? Or If you think this is promotional page than I am helpless. Thanks--Workhardalltime (talk) 10:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep Kumar Mishra (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eternal Shadow were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone is still concerning, and the majority of the sources are unreliable. It appears the subject is not notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandeep Kumar Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandeep Kumar Mishra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 02:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Your edit to Permafrost: Literary Journal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This also applies to your edits to Another Chicago Magazine and Australian Poetry. bonadea contributions talk 09:59, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:George Maverick per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/George Maverick. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]