User talk:WorkNwrite

April 2021

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. EGGIDICAE🥚 19:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for your diligence in moderating Wikipedia, it is appreciated. I was wondering if you could help me understand how my contributions to the topics are spamming? I run a dog blog that discusses these exact topics and wanted to contribute to the wiki page where appropriate. I also noticed you deleted my previous submission which corrected a factual mistake found on the page itself. WorkNwrite (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I went through and read your talk page, and I think I know why you flagged my edits, I will make the needed changes and get back to you for approval. WorkNwrite (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, WorkNwrite. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. If the content of your blog is based on reliable sources, those are what you should cite here, not your blog itself. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clearing this up, what is the process for a direct source? The content I am putting out comes in part from veterinarians that I know personally, and may not be published elsewhere other than my blog, they were cited directly from them. WorkNwrite (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content on Wikipedia must be sourced to a published reliable source with editorial control and fact checking for verification purposes. Even if the blog was not yours(which is an issue itself) most blogs are not considered reliable sources. If the information you want to write about is not published anywhere other than your blog, the chances that information can be on Wikipedia are low. If you wish to assert that your blog should be considered a reliable source, you can attempt to do so at the reliable sources noticeboard- but if you just post information on your blog without editorial control, the chances you would succeed are low. I don't mean to diminish your blog, just telling you the way it is here. Wikipedia is not like a blog. 331dot (talk) 21:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for taking the time to explain this I really appreciate it. I see how this could be an issue and I understand the reason behind it. I was working on a unique graphic to illustrate the disorder I wrote about (the same disorder I wrote about which was marked as spam) that I would use on wiki for demonstration purposes (mentioned in my original edit notes), am I able to cite this to my blog as the creator (will be released with proper usage terms)? How does attribution work for images (I've looked through wiki and there seems to be conflicting info some of which may be depreciated). Thanks again WorkNwrite (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know some about image use, but not a lot, so since I'm not 100% certain about it I'd suggest that you ask at the Teahouse or Help Desk. 331dot (talk) 07:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the help I really appreciate it! WorkNwrite (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]