User talk:WordwizardW

Welcome!

Hello, WordwizardW! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Oldest people. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Please confine comments about improving the article to the talk page. Otherwise, be bold & fix it yourself. Snarkily putting in a end date is akin to vandalism. Peaceray (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peaceray I did not add commentary to the article, nor was I snarkily committing vandalism. I made it more accurate. The list is not to the present; it is only up until the death date of the last man listed. You restored an inaccuracy. I would have fixed it myself, but when I tried to find out who was the current oldest man, there was a computer snafu and I couldn't. I hope someone else will. I put my comments on how to improve the article on the talk page, not into the article, so I don't understand what you're complaining about. If you can make the link work, please do fix the problem instead of reverting to an inaccuracy. WordwizardW (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please go peruse the citations. You will see many current citations. For instance, the citation for Saturnino de la Fuente García is dated 8 February 2021. Therefore your edit summary that "The list is NOT up to the present" is at minimum partially incorrect.

IMHO, you failed to do your homework. Please check the sources next time before making a blanket inaccurate statement. If there are portions that are out of date, please do the legwork to find the citations to update it. Peaceray (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Supercentenarian Data -- Table E". Gerontology Research Group Index Page. Retrieved 2021-04-30. Last Updated On:Apr 29 2021 10:28PM
Peaceray (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you encounter an out-of-date source, it is better to tag it with a template. Please see {{Update inline}}. Note that you can include a reason. Peaceray (talk) 19:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how to tag with a template. I don't understand half of what you're saying. Peruse the citations? If the most recent oldest man is dead, with no live man after him, then OBVIOUSLY the list is not up to date to the present. The list must have the current oldest man at the bottom to be up to date. Period. If you can fix it, do so, and more power to you, rather than complaining about my best attempts. WordwizardW (talk) 21:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm EchidnaLives. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. echidnaLives (talk) 01:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What change are you referring to? WordwizardW (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw there was a new message but nothing this year.

I saw there was a new message (about my eligibility to vote in the current election) but there's nothing showing for this year. WordwizardW (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

revert, Legend of Ruby Sunday

Hello, WordwizardW. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DonQuixote (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to remove the whatsit, though Ive seen the message. WordwizardW (talk) 01:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]