User talk:Wordbearer88

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Béla Kun. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop your edit-warring. You cannot delete content simply because you do not like it. I notice you have a very clear history of this sort of disruptive behaviour. If you do not stop, I will have to take this higher. Thank you. Ya hemos pasao (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding redundant and bias information onto articles. You can not change articles to fit your agenda. I notice you have a very clear history of this sort of disruptive behaviour. If you do not stop, I will have to take this higher. Thank you. --Wordbearer88 (talk) 12:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have proof, but I heavily suspect that you are a sockpuppet

I believe you are a sockpuppet for HelpHelper. I do not have proof, but I have reached this conclusion due to a series of posts attributed to HelpHelper on 4chan. If any administrators or moderators are viewing this, please look into this.TheEpicGhosty (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have proof? No shit, because it's BS. But keep up the thrashing and screaming it's hilarious. P.S. learn to be more subtle in your shilling next time. Wordbearer88 (talk) 02:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would be very interesting to see what IP would be revealed for both accounts. I can't help but notice how this reply was immediately screencapped and posted to 4chan right after it was sent.TheEpicGhosty (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooohhh no not an IP search! Search away, I give no fucks. I've been monitoring your thread before the other guy even arrived. Cope and come up with a better excuse to feed that persecution complex 02:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.