User talk:Word0151

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Word0151! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:53, Saturday, March 25, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The indefinite block doesn't make sense. I wrongly decided to revert the edits in some pages without prior discussion, which though damnable, i think i have endured enough punishment and should be unblocked now. Those reverts don't make all of my edits, and i have made some good edits to pages like Sansho the Bailiff, Hindi etc. I can assure you that since i have let my non-civil and edit-waring behaviour, i won't prove to be obstructive and can make some constructive edits.

Decline reason:

You seem to have been reverting a lot including on the Hindi article you mention. In your next unblock request you should say what constructive edits you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First the edits i would like to make after unblock- Dingal is whole lotta nonsense(i can't even verify the citations), Adding more information in Sergey Nechayev particularly from [1], In articles of Tchaikovsky' Symphonies the section name should be changed from Criticism to Reception, non-existent film articles like Oyuki the Virgin, an article on musical instrument Turahi, adding photograph of Lawrence Bishnoi and M. Jaishankar, Adding use of Violin in Indian Classical, but initial i would like to make small edits like changing image in Tatsuya Nakadai to when he was younger, adding photograph in Shima Iwashita etc. I won't try to make any contentious edits against current scholarly view or the non-disputable general consensus of editors, as i realize this causes unnecessary waste of everyone's time.

And my reverts on Hindi were neither bad edits, you can check the talk page, and after an administrator told me not to revert i stopped and first discussed about the edits. I have also created two articles on rarities: Lala Ram Saran Das Talwar, Jagat Singh Binjal. I also edit on English Wiktionary where i was blocked for a week for vandalizing pages, they didn't blocked me indefinitely because i was useful to the project(i created the entry किरच which was a featured word the day). I think i deserve a second chance.

Decline reason:

A month ago you asked for this page to be deleted and to be able to vanish; what's changed to make you now want to edit? Even if you avoid the areas where you have edit warred previously, disputes are inevitable and I'm not convinced you can handle those without edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, yes i agree i wanted all my user pages to be deleted, but it was not for leaving wikimedia completely, just that i didn't like the pages out of shame i feel reading my own words and for same reasons i have them deleted on Wiktionary. I didn't suddenly decide to get active on wikipedia, i was just inactive(only making minor edits) on wikimedia as a whole due to exams for a month, and they are over so i am back to editing. Secondly, Yes i agree disputes are inevitable, sometime me and sometimes any other user can find problem with a particular edit. I accept that so far i relied mostly on edit summaries instead of discussing peacefully on the talk page. But i also assure that that if a user finds wrong in my edit, i shall discuss and will abide by the consensus reached with fellow editors. I don't really know how can i convince that i won't editwar again, but even on Whiplash where i behaved very childishly, after some reverts i agreed to discuss, and the consensus was reached that my edit was not preferred, i complied to it without reverting again. The reason for my incivility was sullenness only. I should be given atleast a second chance, so that i may convince better perhaps. Thank you very much.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.