User talk:Wooptedoo

Welcome!

Hello, Wooptedoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse, Official Page, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pontificalibus (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse, Official Page

The article Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse, Official Page has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We have an article already at Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse and a redirect from this title would not be appropriate

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:O0pandora0o may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. CT Cooper · talk 19:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. CT Cooper · talk 22:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the comment about taking legal action was here.

As the Wikipedia:No legal threats policy makes clear, users who make threats of legal action or take legal action are not allowed to contribute to the project indefinitely while the threat stands for reasons given in the policy itself. I will only unblock this account if the legal threat is dropped, or the issue is resolved. If you are in contact with the Wikimedia Foundation, you are free to continue discussions with them over the content of the Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse, and hopefully they will resolve the issue for you. While I appreciate that you wish to resolve this on Wikipedia itself, that cannot happen with a threat of legal action hanging over the dispute. CT Cooper · talk 22:41, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was not intending to suggest that we were threatening legal action, but rather that I felt the need to resolve the issues with the Bethel Church article that are grossly inaccurate. It is however very difficult to resolve these issues when every attempt I have made has been frustrated so far. I have to confess that I know nothing about Wikipedia policies, or what the proper course of action is in this case. I do have a concern that due to the misrepresentation of Bethel Church, If it is not resolved to everyone's satisfaction, then due to the content I would have every right to seek legal help. I desperately want to avoid this. Please re-consider unblocking me and help me to find the correct means of resolving these issues for the sake of all involved. Kindly. wooptedoo

Hello again, please sign your posts either by typing four tildes (~~~~) or by pushing the signature button (

) which will automatically produce your username and date as needed.

I'm glad you are keen to settle this onwiki, and I have decided to unblock your account on the presumption that you will not threaten or take legal action unless the onwiki process fails to reach a satisfactory conclusion. I would suggest not mention legal action again unless you are actually pursing it, as doing so tends to make editors feel uneasy.

I have made no significant contributions to the Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse article, nor am I very familiar with the subject. However, I can give some standard advice for editing articles and disputing their contents. Firstly, since you are connected to the organisation the article is on, please ensure you familiarise yourself with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. If you are to succeed in changing the article, you need to show that the article content violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I would recommend familiarising yourself with Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as core policies to start with, and then detailing your concerns on the talk page of the article at Talk:Bethel Church, Mansfield Woodhouse so other editors can respond. CT Cooper · talk 19:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, I will certainly take on board your suggestions. --81.106.175.54 (talk) 21:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Wooptedoo/International Outreach has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Outreach, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

The page John hibbert has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be blatant advertising which only promotes something, and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please see WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest - you shouldn't be creating articles about your own church and your co-ministers. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Outreach.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Outreach concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Outreach, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]