User talk:Woombamillio

Duel (ride)

I'd just like to say what a fantastic job your doing with the duel (ride) edits thank you. My grammar's terrible in encyclopedic mode thank you very much for tidying up any mistakes I make, much appreciated.

Yours truly, Antidanguy.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bubbleworks Exterior.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bubbleworks Tickle Test.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then

Thank you for addressing the 180. --2.217.52.199 (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

London Dungeon

Hi. I'm sure your London Dungeon edits are correct but they are unreferenced. If there are any references you can add to support them then that would help a lot. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Oingo Boingo, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Woombamillio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

duel pov

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwho-veD3tY&t=149s the transition is obvious during the hall of spiders --193.61.240.42 (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So-Lo page

Apologies if my comment on your (I'm assuming it was yours) last So-Lo edit seemed brusque. Re-reading it now, it seems harsher than I intended. I think our differing views on this are very minor. --The Keymaster (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Wardley

How dare you correct my perfect statement? It is against my beliefs Themeparkben (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oingo Boingo and punk

Hi there. I'm not going to revert your edit as Danny does talk about being punk-inspired there, but we actually can't use YouTube clips uploaded by people who don't own the clip. Instead, why don't you properly cite the documentary that clip comes from? Thanks. 45.74.67.15 (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Punk vandalism.

Thanks for ending that sticky situation with the edit warrior by providing a good citation. Incidentally, do you know how to report users? I want to see that ruffian get what's coming to him. Lynchenberg (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and jolly good show for re-adding the citation on the orchestrator! That'll be one in the eye for the vandals, eh? Lynchenberg (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvana and Oingo Boingo

I say old boy, here's the article where Kurt Cobain discusses the influence Oingo Boingo (and Devo!) had on Nirvana: https://www.mojo4music.com/articles/5248/kurt-cobain-quotes-from-moving-in-utero-interview Guess that'd be where AllMusic got that information from, wot? Lynchenberg (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I dare say, it might've been their alternative rock period as Boingo that influenced Nirvana, mmmmmmm? Lynchenberg (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Woombamillio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I'm not sure how much you care but I thought I should let you know that I have reported the IP based troll who has been ineptly trying to disrupt your User Talk page here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/193.61.240.190. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phantom Fantasia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phantom Fantasia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phantom Fantasia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 06:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]