User talk:WoodDraw
Welcome!
Hello, WoodDraw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for David Vitter. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
David Vitter
[edit]Hello. I am glad to see you join Wikipedia. I do have an issue however. I added this edit [1], and in which you deleted it. I have reverted this. However, if you feel it should be removed again, I would like to hear why. I belive that this is a story which should go here because it is a newsworthy story. I am always willing to listen and communicate in order to help this project. I would urge you to respond on my talk page, where we can discuss it. Thanks and good luck here on Wikipedia!!America69 (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hello again. I went back, and looked at the David Vitter talk page. I saw your comments, and have reverted my edit reverting yours. If, and I am looking, I find another source, as in CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News, would you be willing to re-add this. Thanks. America69 (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, that was quick. On CNN, the article also seems to suggest that this could be "blown up".[2] I am now backing off until we find more info. Good work on finding that. Thanks. America69 (talk) 00:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I also agree we should wait until we know what happens. There are two sides, and I guess we wait to find out which is true. =)America69 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert -- I'm out (3 max in a 24 hour period), so I am hanging back except to participate in the discussion. ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 21:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I also agree we should wait until we know what happens. There are two sides, and I guess we wait to find out which is true. =)America69 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, that was quick. On CNN, the article also seems to suggest that this could be "blown up".[2] I am now backing off until we find more info. Good work on finding that. Thanks. America69 (talk) 00:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)