User talk:Wolvve85

Welcome!

Hello Wolvve85! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 12:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

License tagging for Image:Ross School Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ross School Logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding User:Cavsfanman23

It appears this user has been appropriately warned and has since discontinued vandalizing pages. The next time they vandalize a page we can go through the appropriate procedure and get administrator intervention. If you have any other questions about what to do about vandalism feel free to check out the Wikipedia article. Terryfoster 13:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terry...thanks for the action, and for the reply.Wolvve85 17:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Munger wiki-linking

Sorry, wasn't trying to pick on any particular school. I try to clean up after people who go around wiki-linking silly things like the word furniture or place names like Pasadena. Eventually the relaly important links get drowned out by the rest. Then they go to the See Also section, and the process repeats. KonradG 04:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KonradG...thanks for the thoughts. I appreciate your help on this issue. I've left a message back on your talk page that I hope you have received. Your response is quite reasonable, and I appreciate the editing pointer...which I'll attempt to use in good faith. Regards.Wolvve85 17:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, saw it. Thanks. KonradG 17:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

Welcome (fellow wolfie?) __earth ^(Talk) 17:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. Yes, a UM grad. How are you? My editing skills are quite limited at this juncture, so I'm wondering if you might help with the Ross page? I've used the Ross School's public domain section to download the .gif file that is currently used on the page. Wikipedia requires a notice of authentication/permissioning, that I don't know how to provide. The .gif image is definitely in the public domain, so I'm wondering if you might care to authenticate it? Other issues: 1) the site, globally, seems to need more photographs, and more languages (especially for main article); 2) there appear to be a host of articles under various categories (alums, housing, building...), but they don't appear to be accessible from the main article in a useful, visible, coherent fashion; 3) many of the schools have no page...with a page added, users (me) might add more detail.

Please understand that I'm not naturally a delgator, nor am I attempting to do so here, I simply don't have the technical competence to do anything of these things in a way that will improve the article.

Again, thanks for the welcome!! Wolvve85 17:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Possible Addition of Template to UM page?

I apologize for the delay in response (see the note at the top of my talk page for the reason). Anyways, are you referring to the image of company logos that is on the MIT page? I don't see how creating an image like that is difficult - all one has to do is go to company websites (if one exists), do a screen capture, and copy and paste using a graphics tool like Photoshop. However, this might pose a problem, given that company logos are trademarks/copyrights (one can argue that such logos can, in the right context, be used for educational purposes. This is where the "fair use" rationale really comes in handy). Also, how can we determine which companies should show up in such an image? I'll leave that up to you to decide, though in my mind the companies must be large/significant (e.g. Google) for inclusion. Pentawing^Talk 02:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested list:

Name and Entity Pro Con

Larry Page: Google Name Brand

Bill Joy: Sun Microsystems Name Brand

Bill Davidson: Guardian Industries Not enough public recognition?

Louis and Tom Border: Borders Bookstores Regional not National

Charles Edward Merrill: Merrill Lynch & Company Name Brand

Henry W. Bloch: H&R Block, Inc. Name Brand

Jerry White: Landmine Survivors Network Not enough public recognition?

Robert Cailliau: The World Wide Web co-founder Not enough public recognition?

Carl Page: E-Groups (sold to Yahoo) Not enough public recognition?

Niklas Zennstrom: Skype Name Brand

Jeff Masters: The Weatherground Not enough public recognition?

Leo Burnett: Leo Burnett Company Name Brand

J. Robert Beyster: Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) Not enough public recognition?

Stanley Druckenmill: Duquesne Capital Not enough public recognition?

Sam Zell: Equity International Not enough public recognition?

Tom Monaghan: Dominos Pizza Name Brand

Charles Walgreen: Walgreens Regional not national?

Jim Buckmaster: Craigslist Name Brand

David Bohnett: Geocities Not enough public recognition?

Bruce Wasserstein: Wasserstein Perella & Co. Name Brand

Richard P. Tinkham: American Basketball Association No longer extant

Ralph C. Wilson: Owner of the Buffalo Bills Name Brand

Edit war on Michigan Wolverines football

I will ask that you contribute to the discussion on the College Footabll WikiProject discussion page. This content dispute is to the point of ridiculousness and according to Wikipedia this is one of the steps before moving onto arbitration. Rather than discussing this topic you have turned this into an edit war and I would hope you will now contribute to the discussion. I will also warn you that you are very close to violating the 3RR policy. Terryfoster 13:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ross US News BBA Ranking

I am sorry. I only own 2005 version of US News & World Report's college ranking book. I don't know if it is possible to find old datas for rankings 216.165.25.251 01:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

College football championship listings

I looked over the article and the lists that you provided from the NCAA website. However, I don't know if there is a clear way to be able to resolve this problem without a drawn-out edit war. Whoever edited the Wikipedia article to its current state certainly found an outside source, which was very extensive (it uses many sources, some esoteric) and (unfortunately) fairly well-established. Though the NCAA list is equally as valid, the problem I am seeing is that there are several people who disagree with the NCAA source and found something else for one reason or another.

The Wikipedia article does point out some caveats about several schools (including UM) claiming different numbers of championships from the list provided in the article (with some schools actually claiming fewer national championships). However, if one were to utilize the NCAA listings in its entirety for the article, someone else might revert it back with the argument that there are those who don't believe the NCAA list is the definitive one and that the NCAA list wasn't always the official listing at some other time period (notably the 1920s to the 1940s, according to the source I mentioned above, if I recall correctly), and would be unwilling to accept using the NCAA listings.

In such a case, did you try posting a comment on that article's talk page, get a response, and try to talk it over with those people whose opinions differ on which list to use? The last thing I want is a major edit war which would require an arbitrator to step in (and God forbid having Jimbo Wales himself decide the issue). In the meantime, try looking for other college football fans (or fellow Wolverines if you are more comfortable talking to them. earth might be one to try). If you still feel the Wikipedia article needs some more work, try expanding on the caveats I mentioned and cite the NCAA list. Pentawing^Talk 01:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go blue!

Sorry, just feel like shouting. __earth ^(Talk) 04:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the canonical response: http://www.geogreeting.com/view.html?zdgZ-s9Z+1 Wolvve85 04:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You made me smile! __earth ^(Talk) 04:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, pass the smile along, and...Go Blue! Wolvve85 04:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of University of Michigan business alumni

I see you spend a lot of time with the List of University of Michigan business alumni. Does Rob Pelinka belong on that page? TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 01:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Burton Tower 02.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Burton Tower 02.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ross School Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ross School Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1997 Michigan Wolverines football team

I am contacting you based on your extensive involvment in Michigan Wolverines football. I have beefed up 1997 Michigan Wolverines football team. It could use some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive1‎. Also, I had trouble finding game details for the Little Brown Jug game. I hope to take this to WP:FAC so if you get a chance this is one of the more important articles that you might be able to help out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]