User talk:Wollopkon
May 2007
[edit]
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Jesus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Guycalledryan 08:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
What he said...
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. —David Levy 08:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Given your username can I assume you are connected with Wollop Konteki and Beyond imagination? If so you need to read the conflict of interest guidelines. That aside, the main problem is that both entries are failing verifiability and notability requirements and could be put up for deletion unless they are addressed as soon as possible. (Emperor 17:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC))
- Doing some further research I can find no evidence for either of those existing - the publisher brings up absolutely nothing on Wikipedia and Philip Bowrey has been deleted a number of times and is now protected (the user was also blocked: User talk:Insert-cool-user-name-here) and I am curious to know if you can shed some light on that. So given your previous edits were vandalism and that the articles seem to be hoaxes (and connected with some other suspicious articles) I'm going to flag these for deletion in 5 days unless the concerns are addressed. See below for details of what that means and what you can do. (Emperor 18:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC))
Beyond imagination
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beyond imagination, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Emperor 18:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Wollop Konteki
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wollop Konteki, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Emperor 18:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Phzil Bowrey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phzil Bowrey
[edit]I have nominated Phzil Bowrey, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phzil Bowrey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --Snigbrook (talk) 09:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)