Jump to content

User talk:Wolfhound63

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Majavah. An edit that you recently made to United States Army uniforms in World War II seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Majavah (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Army uniforms in World War II. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United States Army uniforms in World War II was changed by Wolfhound63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856129 on 2019-06-04T18:31:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did at United States Army uniforms in World War II, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. User:122.108.183.105 19:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Tried to fix a bad article.

[edit]

This article has extensive inaccuracies. I added sourced edits in the first section since there were many inaccuracies and there were of course no sources for that section at all.

To illustrate the point I will list the inaccuracies of the "Class B" section alone. Except for the first chapter which is now corrected the rest of the chapters are just as bad.

The A,B,C,D uniforms in the article are just totally made up. The fact A and B are modern terms is stated but there wasn't then or now a C or D in the U.S. Army. What is given does not even correspond with USMC A B C D uniforms.

1. The campaign hat could be worn with any uniform.

2. Spread Collar refers to a very wide opening for the tie. The Army shirt was not a spread collar type.

3. Rank was not worn on officer's shirt shoulder straps to "prevent snipers". Prior to 1942 the U.S. pin was worn on the right shirt collar and the branch insignia on the left with rank on the shoulder straps if the shirt was being worn as an outer garment. In 1942 this was changed so the rank was removed from the shoulder straps and the U.S. was replaced by the rank on the right collar point.

4. Enlisted personnel did not wear insignia disks on their shirts in WWII. That was a post war development.

5. Enlisted branch of service disks were not worn on the garrison "overseas" cap.

6. Enlisted service stripes were indeed authorized on service shirt sleeves.


The photo of Donald Prell, while I'm sure chosen to honor a WWII veteran shows a blue infantry cord which was not created until the Korean War era. It is also being worn with armored branch insignia which would not be authorized at any time in the U.S. Army. Although I sympathize with the desire to use a WWII vet's photo it's not an accurate WWII uniform example for the purpose of this article.

I could go on but you get the point. This is but one small section. Most of these are easily sourced in the U.S. Army WWII uniform regulations. I am willing to fix the errors but the edit will be very extensive virtually eliminating whole chapters and adding others.

Please give me feedback if you think an administrator will allow me to correct this with well sourced material or at least put in a disputed notice.

Thank you very much,

Wolfhound63 Wolfhound63 (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wolfhound63:! First off, thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia. I (and a couple of other editors, User:Wtmitchell, User:Garuda28 and bot User:ClueBot NG) reverted your edits for a couple of reasons:
    • You removed large bodies of text without an edit summary ([1], [2], [3]). They were reverted as it is a very common form of vandalism.
    • Some of your edits did not include sources ([4], [5])
I'd recommend adding (sourced) replacement text in the same edit when you remove blocks of text and adding edit summaries. Once again, thanks for helping Wikipedia. :)
–Majavah (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Wolfhound63! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Thank you very much for the suggestions. I will use them. @Wtmitchell:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wolfhound63&oldid=900473007"