User talk:Wolfgang Borman

Please stop trying to spam your website here. Until and unless your organisation gains any notability, it does not belong on Wikipedia. Rebecca 02:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning. If it happens again, you will be blocked from editing. Rebecca 04:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello. My name is Greeves and I will be your Advocate for your case against Rebecca. First off, I have a few questions. Please reply on this talk page if you are comfortable discussing it here. Now, what outcome did you expect to obtain by requesting an Advocate? Also, are you familiar with WP:COI? Finally, would you mind if I also asked Rebecca a few questions? Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • reviews)} 15:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! This has been my first case I have dealt with and I do not believe that advocacy is for me. I am afraid that I must resign from your case. The case status is now NEW once again. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • reviews)} 13:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am an AMA member, also new to advocacy, considering taking your case. Would you mind if I asked you a question? Wikipedia's attribution policy has a reliable sources component requiring article content to be sourced in e.g. mainstream media. Rebecca wrote a comment on Talk:Australian Union of Students claiming there are no sources describing this organization except a private website. Would you be so kind as to address this claim by replying on Talk:Australian Union of Students and, if possible, identifying other sources, in on-line or print media, which describe or mention the organization founded in 1993? It might be worthwhile reviewing our reliable sources policy regarding qualifying sources before doing so. It might be worthwhile in any event to attempt to discuss the matter on the article's talk page, Talk:Australian Union of Students. Perhaps this approach might result in mutual understanding and an agreeable approach without the necessity of mediation. Best, --Shirahadasha 19:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you still interested in the advocacy case you raised with the AMA? If so, please take a moment to reply either on the case page, Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Wolfgang Borman or on my talk page and let us know that you're still interested. If you're not, we can simply close the case. Best, --Shirahadasha 02:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an identified AMA member; however, I have come across this user's request for assistance. On February 10th, per Greeves' request, Wolfgang Borman replied to Greeve's initial questions at his talk page which can be seen here. However, that was February 10th, and Wolfgang Borman hasn't made an edit contribution since then. Judging from this user's edit history, it would indicate that the user has signed up for an account to further the agenda of Australian Union of Students. Thus far, all of the users' edits have either been to add internal and external links to this article and the private site detailing its existence to correct the perceived POV factual errors in the superceding organization, National Union of Students of Australia. After examining all of users' edits, I believe that Rebecca acted in good faith (minus the "rv crackpottery" edit summary) to restore factually verifiable content back to its original state. Please note that this is not meant to be a personal attack but rather a comment on case from the available information. I think its safe to consider this mediation case closed due to a lack of reply and, for the most part, no wrong doing on Rebecca's part. Luke! 13:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since the AMA case has been dormant for a month, we've closed it for lack of reply. Best, --Shirahadasha 01:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not an advocate

Hi, I'm not an advocate but I was going through the advocacy notices. I just wanted to advise you that I feel Rebecca's actions were likely appropriate. As Shirahadasha mentioned, reliable sources are necessary for any wikipedia article. More importantly perhaps, you should refrain from making articles about organisations you are personally involved in. Check out Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If you organisation is noteable enough to merit an article, it is likely someone else will create it. If you want, you can request an article be created in the wikiproject Australia. Just make sure you mention it is an organisation your involved in Nil Einne 07:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]