User talk:WolfMaster2002

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sam Concepcion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan D. Ric (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Sam Concepcion has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Dan D. Ric (talk) 07:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to October 17, you will be blocked from editing. Dan D. Ric (talk) 14:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from my talk page

First off, I am NOT a SYSOP. I am also not any kind of expert on Sam Concepcion. I initially reverted obvious vandalism by you, this edit, with the "removed question marks" edit summary actually adds a bunch of defamatory stuff about Concepcion's family. I therefore reverted it. I also reverted your edit here where your edit summary says "Fixed spelling error" while you actually removed Concepcion's name from the list of October 17 births.

I have not reverted any of your other edits to the article because I have no knowledge of Sam Concepcion and do not feel I can revert anything but obvious vandalism. You seem to continue to use misleading edit summaries. Since I am not a sysop, my talk page is not a good place for this discussion, take it to Talk:Sam Concepcion and please don't edit war, I will be watching the article for three revert violations and defamatory edits. Dan D. Ric (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]